Dong B J, Hauck W W, Gambertoglio J G, Gee L, White J R, Bubp J L, Greenspan F S
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco 94143-0622, USA.
JAMA. 1997 Apr 16;277(15):1205-13.
To compare relative bioavailability of Synthroid, Levoxine (Levoxine has been renamed Levoxyl), and 2 generic levothyroxine sodium preparations.
Single-blind (primary investigators blinded), randomized, 4-way crossover trial.
Ambulatory care.
Twenty-two women with hypothyroidism who were clinically and chemically euthyroid and were receiving levothyroxine sodium, 0.1 or 0.15 mg.
All patients received each of the 4 levothyroxine products for 6-week periods in the same dosage as their prestudy regimen with no washout period. The order of the drug sequences was randomly determined before study initiation.
Area under the curve, time to peak serum concentrations, and peak serum concentrations of thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and free thyroxine index for all 4 products.
All data analyses were completed prior to unblinding of the product codes. No significant differences between the 4 products were found in area under the curve or peak serum concentrations of total thyroxine, total triiodothyronine, or free thyroxine index. Although Synthroid produced a more rapid rise in total serum triiodothyronine concentration and a higher total peak serum triiodothyronine concentration than the other products, these differences were not statistically significant (P=.08). The Food and Drug Administration criterion for relative bioequivalence within 90% confidence intervals (0.8-1.25) was demonstrated (P<.05) for all pairs of products. Relative bioequivalence of 0.95 to 1.07 was demonstrated, tighter than the current bioequivalence criterion for oral formulations.
The 4 generic and brand-name levothyroxine preparations studied are different but are bioequivalent by current Food and Drug Administration criteria and are interchangeable in the majority of patients receiving thyroxine replacement therapy. Further investigation is required to determine whether our results are equally applicable to all existing levothyroxine preparations.
比较左旋甲状腺素片(优甲乐)、雷替斯(雷替斯已更名为左甲状腺素钠片)以及两种左旋甲状腺素钠仿制药的相对生物利用度。
单盲(主要研究者设盲)、随机、四交叉试验。
门诊护理。
22名甲状腺功能减退女性,临床及化学检查甲状腺功能正常,正在接受0.1或0.15毫克的左旋甲状腺素钠治疗。
所有患者均按其研究前治疗方案的相同剂量,接受4种左旋甲状腺素产品,每种服用6周,无洗脱期。药物顺序在研究开始前随机确定。
所有4种产品的曲线下面积、血清浓度达峰时间以及甲状腺素、三碘甲状腺原氨酸和游离甲状腺素指数的血清峰浓度。
所有数据分析均在产品编码解盲前完成。4种产品在曲线下面积或总甲状腺素、总三碘甲状腺原氨酸或游离甲状腺素指数的血清峰浓度方面未发现显著差异。尽管优甲乐使血清总三碘甲状腺原氨酸浓度升高更快,总血清峰浓度高于其他产品,但这些差异无统计学意义(P = 0.08)。所有产品对均符合美国食品药品监督管理局90%置信区间(0.8 - 1.25)内相对生物等效性标准(P < 0.05)。证明相对生物等效性为0.95至1.07,比目前口服制剂的生物等效性标准更严格。
所研究的4种左旋甲状腺素仿制药和品牌药虽有差异,但按美国食品药品监督管理局现行标准具有生物等效性,在大多数接受甲状腺素替代治疗的患者中可互换使用。需要进一步研究以确定我们的结果是否同样适用于所有现有的左旋甲状腺素制剂。