Suppr超能文献

多项试验数据的解读:批判性综述。

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

作者信息

Conn H O

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.118127000.x.

Abstract

The objective was to review the current status of meta-analysis, the process of combining the results of similar investigations, which was described in 1976. It has evolved rapidly, and thousands have already been published. Meta-analysis may be performed in a narrative form or in the preferred statistical format, which is more rigorous and demanding. The criteria for designing and performing a meta-analysis of high quality are presented and discussed in detail, including selection criteria, quality, biases and heterogeneity, both of component studies and of results. Critical reviews of meta-analyses are presented. Examples are given from my own field--hepatology--and from my own research experience. Although meta-analysis is simple in concept, it is complex in execution. If performed with insufficient insight or attention to detail, it may give ambiguous or erroneous results.

摘要

目的是回顾荟萃分析的现状,即1976年所描述的整合相似研究结果的过程。它发展迅速,已有数千篇相关文献发表。荟萃分析可以采用叙述形式或更严谨、要求更高的首选统计形式进行。详细介绍并讨论了高质量荟萃分析的设计和实施标准,包括组成研究及结果的选择标准、质量、偏倚和异质性。对荟萃分析进行了批判性综述。给出了来自我所在领域——肝病学——以及我个人研究经验的例子。尽管荟萃分析概念简单,但实施起来很复杂。如果缺乏足够的洞察力或对细节关注不够,可能会得出模糊或错误的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验