• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多项试验数据的解读:批判性综述。

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

作者信息

Conn H O

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.118127000.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.118127000.x
PMID:9104430
Abstract

The objective was to review the current status of meta-analysis, the process of combining the results of similar investigations, which was described in 1976. It has evolved rapidly, and thousands have already been published. Meta-analysis may be performed in a narrative form or in the preferred statistical format, which is more rigorous and demanding. The criteria for designing and performing a meta-analysis of high quality are presented and discussed in detail, including selection criteria, quality, biases and heterogeneity, both of component studies and of results. Critical reviews of meta-analyses are presented. Examples are given from my own field--hepatology--and from my own research experience. Although meta-analysis is simple in concept, it is complex in execution. If performed with insufficient insight or attention to detail, it may give ambiguous or erroneous results.

摘要

目的是回顾荟萃分析的现状,即1976年所描述的整合相似研究结果的过程。它发展迅速,已有数千篇相关文献发表。荟萃分析可以采用叙述形式或更严谨、要求更高的首选统计形式进行。详细介绍并讨论了高质量荟萃分析的设计和实施标准,包括组成研究及结果的选择标准、质量、偏倚和异质性。对荟萃分析进行了批判性综述。给出了来自我所在领域——肝病学——以及我个人研究经验的例子。尽管荟萃分析概念简单,但实施起来很复杂。如果缺乏足够的洞察力或对细节关注不够,可能会得出模糊或错误的结果。

相似文献

1
Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.多项试验数据的解读:批判性综述。
J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.118127000.x.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
3
Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?临床药物试验的Meta分析——金标准综述还是统计炼金术?
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2000 Sep;29(5):610-5.
4
Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.研究亮点:统计学的意义与合并的危险。第 3 部分:荟萃分析和系统评价的要点与陷阱。
Arthroscopy. 2017 Aug;33(8):1594-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.055. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.随机对照试验的系统评价:对完整数据的需求。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):119-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1995.tb00017.x.
6
Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine.随机对照试验和系统评价:循证围产医学的基础
Acta Paediatr. 1996 Jun;85(6):647-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14116.x.
7
[Critical reading of clinical trials].[临床试验的批判性阅读]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2011 Dec;34(10):755-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
8
"Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century": discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions.“荟萃分析:21世纪的统计魔法”:讨论。呼吁对荟萃分析以及医疗保健干预效果的系统综述持更平衡的观点。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):81-6. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00115-7.
9
Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.元分析中的异质性和统计学意义:对125项元分析的实证研究
Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::aid-sim491>3.0.co;2-p.
10
A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.一项对最近的荟萃分析的方法学回顾发现,随机分组之间的年龄存在显著异质性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):1016-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
An updated meta-analysis of risk of multiple sclerosis following infectious mononucleosis.传染性单核细胞增多症后多发性硬化症风险的更新荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 1;5(9):e12496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012496.
2
A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the Stroop task.基于标签的回顾与Stroop任务中的ALE元分析比较。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):6-21. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20129.