Vedrinne J M, Duperret S, Decaillot F, Gratadour P, Motin J
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):354-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03014453.
To assess the effects of controlled ventilation with two I:E ratios on haemodynamic and left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients with moderate to severe respiratory disease, using fluctuation of the arterial pressure waveform and the changes in left ventricular areas obtained by transoesophageal echocardiography.
Nine patients had their lungs ventilated using volume controlled ventilation with two I:E ratios 1:3 and 1:1). Respiratory rate was adjusted so that six cardiac beats occurred during a respiratory cycle. Systolic blood pressure variation (SBPV), left ventricular area variations measured by TEE and haemodynamic variables measured by PA catheter were compared.
When compared with I:E (1:3), I:E (1:1) decreased end diastolic area (EDA) throughout the respiratory cycle from 3% to 8% (P < 0.01) and increased SBPV from 6 +/- 1 to 11 +/- 1 mmHg (P < 0.01). In four patients, SBPV was > 12 mmHg with I:E 1:1. Conversely, SBPV was < 10 mmHg in all patients with I:E 1:3. With I:E (1:1), EDA decreased up to 7% during expiration (P < 0.01). The ejection fraction area remained stable for both ventilatory patterns and throughout the ventilatory cycle for a given I:E. The usual invasive haemodynamic variables were unchanged throughout the study, as was PaO2/FIO2.
In this setting, EDA and SBPV allow beat-to-beat evaluation of left ventricular preload during change of I:E ratio. Switch from I:E 1:3 to 1:1 may be used as a rapid, safe and reversible test to estimate intravascular volume status assessed by changes in SBPV or EDA.
利用动脉压波形的波动以及经食管超声心动图获得的左心室面积变化,评估两种吸气与呼气时间比(I:E)的控制通气对中重度呼吸系统疾病机械通气患者血流动力学和左心室功能的影响。
9例患者采用容量控制通气,设置两种I:E比(1:3和1:1)。调整呼吸频率,使一个呼吸周期内出现6次心跳。比较收缩压变异(SBPV)、经食管超声心动图测量的左心室面积变异以及肺动脉导管测量的血流动力学变量。
与I:E为1:3相比,I:E为1:1时,整个呼吸周期的舒张末期面积(EDA)从3%降至8%(P<0.01),SBPV从6±1 mmHg增至11±1 mmHg(P<0.01)。4例患者I:E为1:1时SBPV>12 mmHg。相反,I:E为1:3时所有患者的SBPV<10 mmHg。I:E为1:1时,呼气时EDA最多下降7%(P<0.01)。两种通气模式下以及给定I:E的整个通气周期内,射血分数面积均保持稳定。整个研究过程中,常用的有创血流动力学变量以及动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO2/FIO2)均无变化。
在此情况下,EDA和SBPV可用于在I:E比改变期间逐搏评估左心室前负荷。从I:E 1:3切换至1:1可用作一种快速、安全且可逆的试验,以通过SBPV或EDA的变化评估血管内容量状态。