Christiansen F
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1997;410:1-33.
The common strategy of combining clinical information, lung scintigraphy and pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), has many limitations in clinical use. The major causes are that pulmonary angiography and lung scintigraphy are not universally available, and that pulmonary angiography is very expensive. The purpose of this thesis was to analyse different aspects of validity in regard to lung scintigraphy, pulmonary angiography, spiral CT, and ultrasound of the legs, with the subsequent intention of discussing new diagnostic strategies. Observer variations in lung scintigraphy interpretation when applying the PIOPED criteria were tested in 2 studies with 2 and 3 observers respectively and expressed as kappa values. The ability to improve agreement in lung scintigraphy interpretation was tested by training 2 observers from different hospitals. The impact of 3 observers' variations in lung scintigraphy interpretation when compared to pulmonary angiography, was tested by comparing the ROC areas of the observers. The value of combining subjectively derived numerical probabilities and the PIOPED categorical probabilities in lung scintigraphy reporting was compared to using the PIOPED categorization only, and this was tested by comparing ROC areas. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting an embolic source in the deep veins of the legs by ultrasound as a sign of PE when lung scintigraphy is inconclusive, was tested by comparison with pulmonary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of spiral CT, compared to pulmonary angiography, was tested by comparison to pulmonary angiography. The inter- and intra-observer kappa values were in the range of moderate and fair. It was not possible to achieve better kappa values after training. Although observer variations were substantial, the accuracy did not differ significantly between the 3 observers. Incoorporating subjectively derived probabilities into lung scan reporting could not reduce the number of inconclusive investigations. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting PE was 0.70 and 0.97, respectively. However, 2 patients (of 9) had deep venous thrombosis and no pulmonary emboli at angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of spiral CT was 0.90 and 0.96, respectively. The observer variations at lung scintigraphy are substantial and may be difficult to improve between hospitals, even though the accuracy of observers in general is good. Although subjectively derived interpretation criteria did not show to be useful when added to categorical interpretation criteria, they may be useful when substituting established criteria. Despite recent progress in refining interpretation criteria, a substantial fraction of the patients still need pulmonary angiography to be performed. However, in many patients pulmonary angiography is not performed as prescribed. Spiral CT and ultrasound of the legs is a new favourable diagnostic strategy with a high validity in detecting venous thromboembolic disease, and a good availability and cost-effectiveness.
在急性肺栓塞(PE)诊断中,将临床信息、肺闪烁扫描术和肺血管造影术相结合的常用策略在临床应用中有许多局限性。主要原因是肺血管造影术和肺闪烁扫描术并非普遍可用,且肺血管造影术费用高昂。本论文的目的是分析肺闪烁扫描术、肺血管造影术、螺旋CT和腿部超声在有效性方面的不同情况,随后讨论新的诊断策略。在两项研究中分别对2名和3名观察者应用PIOPED标准解读肺闪烁扫描术时的观察者差异进行了测试,并以kappa值表示。通过培训来自不同医院的2名观察者,测试提高肺闪烁扫描术解读一致性的能力。通过比较观察者的ROC曲线面积,测试3名观察者在肺闪烁扫描术解读方面与肺血管造影术相比的差异影响。将主观得出的数值概率与PIOPED分类概率相结合用于肺闪烁扫描术报告的价值与仅使用PIOPED分类进行了比较,并通过比较ROC曲线面积进行了测试。当肺闪烁扫描术结果不明确时,通过与肺血管造影术比较,测试腿部超声检测腿部深静脉栓塞源作为PE征象的敏感性和特异性。将螺旋CT与肺血管造影术相比的敏感性和特异性,通过与肺血管造影术比较进行了测试。观察者间和观察者内的kappa值处于中等和一般水平。培训后无法获得更好的kappa值。尽管观察者差异很大,但3名观察者之间的准确性差异不显著。将主观得出的概率纳入肺扫描报告并不能减少不明确检查的数量。超声检测PE的敏感性和特异性分别为0.70和0.97。然而,在血管造影术中,9名患者中有2名有深静脉血栓形成但无肺栓塞。螺旋CT的敏感性和特异性分别为0.90和0.96。肺闪烁扫描术的观察者差异很大,即使观察者的总体准确性良好,不同医院之间也可能难以改善。尽管在完善解读标准方面取得了近期进展,但仍有相当一部分患者需要进行肺血管造影术。然而,在许多患者中,肺血管造影术并未按规定进行。螺旋CT和腿部超声是一种新的有利诊断策略,在检测静脉血栓栓塞性疾病方面具有较高的有效性,且可用性和成本效益良好。