Suppr超能文献

关于经典心理物理学和反应偏差测量的误解。

Misconceptions about classical psychophysics and the measurement of response bias.

作者信息

Gardner R M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Denver 80217-3364, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Apr;84(2):587-94. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.587.

Abstract

Misconceptions exist about the ability of classical psychophysical techniques to measure separately the sensory and nonsensory (response bias) factors in a discrimination task. The views of the early researchers in psychophysics are reviewed. The manner in which the method of constant stimuli gives separate measures of sensory sensitivity and response bias is illustrated. Modern derivatives of classical psychophysical techniques which estimates sensory and nonsensory components are described. Finally, data indicating a correspondence between sensory and nonsensory factors obtained with various psychological techniques are reviewed.

摘要

对于经典心理物理学技术在辨别任务中分别测量感觉因素和非感觉因素(反应偏差)的能力,存在一些误解。本文回顾了早期心理物理学研究者的观点。阐述了恒定刺激法如何分别测量感觉敏感性和反应偏差。描述了估计感觉和非感觉成分的经典心理物理学技术的现代衍生方法。最后,回顾了表明通过各种心理学技术获得的感觉因素和非感觉因素之间存在对应关系的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验