Hofmeyr G J, Lawrie T, de Jager M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coronation Hospital.
S Afr Med J. 1997 Feb;87(2):171-2.
Conventional vibro-acoustic stimulation tests require expensive vibro-acoustic stimulators and electronic monitoring equipment. Attempts to simplify the test have been made using an electric toothbrush and razor but even these simpler devices are not available in most primary care settings. We compared the sound pressure generated by a Corometrics 146 vibro-acoustic stimulator to that of an empty soft-drink can in an in vitro study. The can compared favourably to the conventional vibro-acoustic stimulator.
传统的振动声学刺激测试需要昂贵的振动声学刺激器和电子监测设备。人们曾尝试使用电动牙刷和剃须刀来简化测试，但即使是这些更简单的设备在大多数初级保健机构中也无法获得。在一项体外研究中，我们将科罗梅特里克146型振动声学刺激器产生的声压与一个空的软饮料罐产生的声压进行了比较。该软饮料罐与传统的振动声学刺激器相比表现良好。
