• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于急诊科损伤监测的简化E编码系统:描述与临床测量测试

A truncated E-code system for injury surveillance in the emergency department: description and clinometric testing.

作者信息

Bota G W, Therrien S A, Rowe B H

机构信息

Sudbury General Hospital, Emergency Department, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;4(4):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03551.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03551.x
PMID:9107328
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

ED injury surveillance requires accurate information about mechanism. This study explored the clinometric properties of an E-code system specifically designed to track ED injuries.

METHODS

All patients assessed in the ED had cause-of-injury information documented using a truncated E-code system. Patient records were hand-searched to determine coding compliance. A selection of 98 charts (50 injury/48 noninjury) were coded by 7 physicians, 2 nurses, and 2 nosologists. Agreements (interrater and intrarater) on the diagnosis of trauma and exact E-codes were determined (using kappa; kappa).

RESULTS

E-coding compliance was high (overall 90%: 95% CI: 85-93%), and accuracy of injury classification was 99%. Compared with an expert's coding, agreement on injury classification was excellent for physicians (kappa = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.80-1.0), nurses (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.0), and nosologists (kappa = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-1.0). Agreement was substantial for the exact E-codes between physicians (kappa = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.94) and nurses (kappa = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90). Recode reliability was also excellent for physicians (kappa = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75-1.0) and nurses (kappa = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88-1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Injury coding using a truncated E-code system can provide valid and reliable data from the ED. Differences between nurses, physicians, and nosologists in the ability to accurately code using this system were minimal, thus eliminating the need for additional staff and resources.

摘要

目的

急诊损伤监测需要有关损伤机制的准确信息。本研究探讨了专门设计用于追踪急诊损伤的E编码系统的临床测量特性。

方法

在急诊接受评估的所有患者均使用简化的E编码系统记录损伤原因信息。人工查阅患者记录以确定编码合规性。98份病历(50份损伤/48份非损伤)由7名医生、2名护士和2名疾病分类学家进行编码。确定了(使用kappa系数)在创伤诊断和确切E编码方面的一致性(评分者间和评分者内)。

结果

E编码合规率很高(总体为90%:95%可信区间:85 - 93%),损伤分类准确率为99%。与专家编码相比,医生(kappa = 0.91;95%可信区间:0.80 - 1.0)、护士(kappa = 0.88;95%可信区间:0.75 - 1.0)和疾病分类学家(kappa = 0.92;95%可信区间:0.81 - 1.0)在损伤分类方面的一致性极佳。医生(kappa = 0.77;95%可信区间:0.60 - 0.94)和护士(kappa = 0.72;95%可信区间:0.54 - 0.90)在确切E编码方面的一致性较高。医生(kappa = 0.88;95%可信区间:0.75 - 1.0)和护士(kappa = 0.96;95%可信区间:0.88 - 1.0)的重新编码可靠性也极佳。

结论

使用简化的E编码系统进行损伤编码能够从急诊提供有效且可靠的数据。护士、医生和疾病分类学家在使用该系统进行准确编码的能力上差异极小,因此无需额外的人员和资源。

相似文献

1
A truncated E-code system for injury surveillance in the emergency department: description and clinometric testing.用于急诊科损伤监测的简化E编码系统:描述与临床测量测试
Acad Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;4(4):291-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03551.x.
2
Accuracy of e-codes assigned to emergency department records.分配给急诊科记录的电子代码的准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;2(7):615-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03599.x.
3
Emergency department coding of bicycle and pedestrian injuries during the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10.急诊部门在从 ICD-9 到 ICD-10 的过渡期间对自行车和行人伤害进行编码。
Inj Prev. 2012 Apr;18(2):88-93. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.031302. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
Injury surveillance: a method for recording E codes for injured emergency department patients.损伤监测:一种为急诊科受伤患者记录E编码的方法。
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jan;21(1):37-40. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82234-6.
5
Electronic injury surveillance in Perth emergency departments: validity of the data.珀斯急诊科的电子伤害监测:数据的有效性
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Aug;19(4):309-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00942.x.
6
Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.急诊患者诊疗记录与编码:电子病历准确性评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):664-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.005.
7
Accuracy of external cause of injury codes reported in Washington State hospital discharge records.华盛顿州医院出院记录中报告的伤害外部原因编码的准确性。
Inj Prev. 2001 Dec;7(4):334-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.4.334.
8
The validity of chief complaint and discharge diagnosis in emergency department-based syndromic surveillance.基于急诊科症状监测中主诉及出院诊断的有效性
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.013.
9
Limitations of pulmonary embolism ICD-10 codes in emergency department administrative data: let the buyer beware.急诊科管理数据中肺栓塞ICD - 10编码的局限性:买家需谨慎。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jun 8;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0361-1.
10
Low-impact strategy for capturing better emergency department injury surveillance data.低影响策略提高急诊科伤害监测数据质量。
Inj Prev. 2019 Dec;25(6):507-513. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042958. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting Suicide-Related Emergency Department Visits Among Adults Using the District of Columbia Syndromic Surveillance System.利用哥伦比亚特区症状监测系统检测成年人中与自杀相关的急诊科就诊情况。
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(1_suppl):88S-94S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917706933.
2
Unspecified falls among youth: predictors of coding specificity in the emergency department.青年人群中未明确的跌倒:急诊科编码特异性的预测因素
Inj Prev. 2006 Oct;12(5):302-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.011924.