Castellani D, Bechelli C, Tiscione E, Lo Nostro A, Pierleoni P P
Tufts University Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Int J Prosthodont. 1996 Sep-Oct;9(5):459-65.
This study compared plaque accumulation on glazed and nonglazed metal ceramic porcelain surfaces with shaded and nonshaded Dicor cast ceramic surfaces. Plaque accumulation on natural teeth was also measured at 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Bacterial cultures were prepared from each sample to establish the aerobic and anaerobic charge. Plaque accumulation between 12 and 24 hours was measured on different materials. No significant differences were discovered between the plaque-retaining capacities of metal ceramic porcelain and Dicor ceramic surfaces. There was less plaque accumulation on glazed surfaces than on nonglazed surfaces.
本研究比较了金属烤瓷瓷表面有釉和无釉、Dicor铸造陶瓷表面有遮色层和无遮色层的菌斑堆积情况。还在4小时、12小时、24小时和48小时测量了天然牙上的菌斑堆积情况。从每个样本制备细菌培养物以确定需氧菌和厌氧菌数量。测量了12至24小时不同材料间的菌斑堆积情况。金属烤瓷瓷表面和Dicor陶瓷表面的菌斑留存能力之间未发现显著差异。有釉表面的菌斑堆积比无釉表面少。