Rasim Z M, Alzahrani M A, Sigman H H, Meakins J L, Fried G M
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Apr;7(2):133-6.
Several techniques for laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy have been described in the literature: laparoscopic extraperitoneal mesh repair (EXTRA), transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair (TAPP), and intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM). To evaluate the incidence of adhesion formation and the tensile properties of these techniques, young male pigs underwent mesh placement using the above techniques. The animals had follow-up for 6 weeks, and no trocar site adhesions were observed. No intraperitoneal adhesions resulted in the group that underwent EXTRA technique. One case of filmy omental adhesions was observed with the TAPP technique, and two cases of adhesions were associated with the IPOM technique, one minimal and one case of dense adhesions to the bladder. The tensile strength of mesh incorporation into abdominal fascia was compared for the three techniques and measured using a tensiometer. The IPOM technique resulted in the weakest tensile strength of 0.53 +/- 0.01 kg (mean +/- SEM), whereas both the EXTRA and TAPP were comparable and significantly stronger (p < 0.05), with tensiometric values of 0.69 +/- 0.03 and 0.60 +/- 0.02 kg, respectively. We concluded that IPOM, although technically the easiest procedure to perform, is associated with the highest risk of adhesion formation and the lowest tensile strength. In comparison, the EXTRA and the TAPP techniques had the advantages of better tissue incorporation and tensile strength. Adhesion formation was not observed with the EXTRA technique, in which the peritoneum was not violated, and was uncommon and minimal with the TAPP technique.
腹腔镜腹膜外补片修补术(EXTRA)、经腹腹膜前补片修补术(TAPP)和腹腔内覆盖补片修补术(IPOM)。为评估这些技术中粘连形成的发生率和拉伸特性,对年轻雄性猪采用上述技术进行补片植入。动物随访6周,未观察到套管针穿刺部位粘连。接受EXTRA技术的组未出现腹腔内粘连。采用TAPP技术观察到1例薄网膜粘连,采用IPOM技术观察到2例粘连,1例轻微,1例与膀胱致密粘连。比较了三种技术补片与腹横筋膜结合的拉伸强度,并使用张力计进行测量。IPOM技术导致最弱的拉伸强度,为0.53±0.01 kg(平均值±标准误),而EXTRA和TAPP技术相当且明显更强(p<0.05),张力测量值分别为0.69±0.03 kg和0.60±0.02 kg。我们得出结论,IPOM虽然在技术上是最容易实施的手术,但粘连形成风险最高且拉伸强度最低。相比之下,EXTRA和TAPP技术具有更好的组织结合和拉伸强度优势。EXTRA技术未观察到粘连形成,该技术未侵犯腹膜,TAPP技术粘连少见且轻微。