Cutaneous representations of the hand and other body parts in the cuneate nucleus of a primate, and some relationships to previously described cortical representations.

Dynamic properties of primate somatosensory maps are dependent on normal central adjacencies of cutaneous representations. The cuneate nucleus is an important brainstem processing center of cutaneous information. Surprisingly, there are no descriptions of functional representations of the skin in the primate cuneate nucleus; as a result, the relationships of functional representations at the brainstem level and other levels of the somatosensory neuraxis remain obscure. The present neurophysiological study indicates that the main cuneate nucleus of marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) contains organized representations of cutaneous inputs from the hand, forelimb, and adjacent body between the lateral face and proximal hindlimb. Inputs from the glabrous hand are represented continuously across transverse planes in the cuneate, whereas inputs from the hairy hand are represented discontinuously. Inputs from distal to proximal, and radial to ulnar, parts of the hand are mapped in an organized manner. At rostrocaudal levels where the cuneate nucleus is near its largest transverse area, the map of the hand is about 2600 times smaller than the hand skin area it represents. Cuneate representations of the forelimb and trunk are represented both medial and lateral to the hand representation, and interface with representations in the adjacent gracile and trigeminal nuclei. These findings provide a starting point for understanding functional representations of the skin in the cuneate nucleus of primates. Furthermore, they provide a basis for understanding relationships of cutaneous representations at different levels of the neuraxis. In this regard, comparisons of the present results to previously defined representations in the somatosensory (area 3b) cortex indicate that cuneate hand representations are several times smaller than cortical representations, and that there are similarities and differences in adjacencies of cuneate and cortical representations.