Linhorst D M
Department of Quality Management, St. Louis State Hospital, MO 63139, USA.
J Ment Health Adm. 1997 Spring;24(2):166-77. doi: 10.1007/BF02898511.
Using Missouri's insanity acquittee system as a case study, this analysis explores the extent to which legislation can structure the implementation of mental health policy. It found that Missouri's insanity acquittee legislation substantially structured policy implementation toward its primary goal of public safety. It did so (a) by including actors from both the criminal justice and mental health systems in the insanity acquittee release process, (b) by specifying procedures and criteria for the commitment and release of insanity acquittees, and (c) by requiring monthly monitoring of insanity acquittees released into the community and funding the staff positions to conduct the monitoring. The ability of legislation to structure policy implementation highlights the need for active involvement by mental health policy makers in the legislative process to shape policy goals and to structure implementation to support the interests of the mental health community. Without this involvement, implementation options available to mental health administrators may be severely limited.
以密苏里州的精神错乱无罪裁决者系统为例,本分析探讨了立法在多大程度上能够构建心理健康政策的实施。研究发现,密苏里州关于精神错乱无罪裁决者的立法在很大程度上围绕公共安全这一主要目标构建了政策实施。其做法如下:(a)在精神错乱无罪裁决者释放过程中纳入刑事司法系统和心理健康系统的相关人员;(b)明确精神错乱无罪裁决者收押和释放的程序及标准;(c)要求对释放到社区的精神错乱无罪裁决者进行每月监测,并为开展监测的工作人员职位提供资金。立法构建政策实施的能力凸显了心理健康政策制定者积极参与立法过程以塑造政策目标并构建实施方式以支持心理健康群体利益的必要性。没有这种参与,心理健康管理人员可采用的实施选项可能会受到严重限制。