• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于巴氏涂片检查的报告免责声明及合理预期:澳大利亚视角

Report disclaimers and informed expectations about Papanicolaou smears: an Australian view.

作者信息

Mitchell H

机构信息

Victorian Cytology Service, Inc, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):327-30.

PMID:9111128
Abstract

The cervical cancer screening program in Australia has an emerging litigation problem. This paper reviews some recent initiatives taken to address the problem. These initiatives include the establishment of registries of women being screened, education to promote an appreciation of the limitations of screening, and the introduction of outcome standards for laboratories reporting cervical cytology. An international evidence-based definition of the standard of care is the most pressing need in the immediate future. Possible roles of report disclaimers, informed consent, improved information about the average level of accuracy of a cervical cytology report, and the use of a range of differential diagnoses in addressing the medicolegal problems of cervical screening are explored.

摘要

澳大利亚的宫颈癌筛查项目正面临一个新出现的诉讼问题。本文回顾了近期为解决该问题所采取的一些举措。这些举措包括建立接受筛查女性的登记册、开展教育以促进对筛查局限性的认识,以及引入宫颈细胞学检查报告的结果标准。在不久的将来,基于国际证据的医疗护理标准定义是最迫切的需求。本文探讨了报告免责声明、知情同意、提供关于宫颈细胞学报告平均准确率的更多信息,以及使用一系列鉴别诊断方法在解决宫颈筛查法医学问题方面可能发挥的作用。

相似文献

1
Report disclaimers and informed expectations about Papanicolaou smears: an Australian view.关于巴氏涂片检查的报告免责声明及合理预期:澳大利亚视角
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Mar;121(3):327-30.
2
Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.法医学事务。国际细胞学会特别工作组总结。《迈向21世纪的诊断细胞学:一次国际专家会议及教程》
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. doi: 10.1159/000331537.
3
Organisation of cervical cytology screening in Croatia: past, present and future.
Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:47-54.
4
Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for educational notes, disclaimers, and similar comments on reports of cervical cytology specimens.帕帕尼科拉乌细胞病理学协会关于宫颈细胞学标本报告的教育笔记、免责声明及类似评论的指南。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 May;28(5):282-5. doi: 10.1002/dc.10284.
5
Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.知情同意?基层医疗专业人员如何让女性为宫颈涂片检查做好准备:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.017. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
6
Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part IV.癌症护理与法律:知情拒绝。第四部分。
Cancer Nurs. 1980 Dec;3(6):467-8.
7
High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州的高级别宫颈异常与筛查间隔
J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):36-43. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.007036.
8
A medical error leads to tragedy: how do we inform the patient?医疗失误导致悲剧:我们该如何告知患者?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Oct-Nov;23(5):417-21. doi: 10.1177/1049909106292725.
9
Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
Aust Fam Physician. 2009 Apr;38(4):188-92.
10
Cervical cancer screening and management practices among providers in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目(NBCCEDP)中医疗服务提供者的宫颈癌筛查与管理实践。
Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):1024-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22875.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers.乳腺钼靶筛查的感知敏感性:女性对检测准确性及漏诊癌症经济补偿的看法
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Nov;53(11):716-20. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.11.716.
2
Cervical cancer prevention for all Canadians.为所有加拿大人预防宫颈癌。
Can Fam Physician. 1999 Feb;45:245-7, 252-4.
3
Assessing diagnostic errors: when is suspension of a pathologist justified?评估诊断错误:何时病理学家停职是合理的?
J Clin Pathol. 1998 Sep;51(9):649-51. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.9.649.