Kreder H J, Deyo R A, Koepsell T, Swiontkowski M F, Kreuter W
Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, North York, Ontario, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Apr;79(4):485-94. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199704000-00003.
Since the late 1970's, an empirical relationship between the volume of procedures performed by a provider (a hospital or surgeon) and the outcome has been documented for various operations. The present study examines the relationship between the volume of hip replacements performed by surgeons and hospitals and the postoperative rate of complications. A statewide hospital discharge registry was used to identify patients who had had an elective hip replacement between 1988 and 1991. Patients who had had a revision procedure, who had been referred on an emergency basis, or who had had a diagnosis of a fracture or a malignant tumor on admission were excluded. There were 7936 eligible patients who had had 8774 hip replacements. The average annual number of all hip replacements performed from 1987 through 1991 was subsequently determined for each hospital and surgeon who had cared for at least one patient in the study cohort. The rate of operative complications was modeled as a function of the volume of procedures performed by the surgeon or hospital (the surgeon or hospital volume), with adjustment for the age of the patient, gender, co-morbidity, and operative diagnosis. We noted significant differences in the case mix of low-volume providers compared with that of high-volume providers (p < 0.01). In general, surgeons and hospitals with a volume below the fortieth percentile managed patients who had a more adverse risk profile in terms of age, co-morbidity, and diagnosis. Even after adjustment for the case mix, there was a significant relationship between surgeons who averaged fewer than two hip replacements annually (low-volume surgeons) and a worse outcome (p < 0.05). Patients managed by these low-volume surgeons tended to have higher mortality rates, more infections, higher rates of revision operations, and more serious complications during the index hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization was inversely related to surgeon volume and directly associated with hospital volume. Hospital charges were inversely related to hospital volume, even after adjustment for patient-related factors as well as the duration of hospitalization, the year of the operation, and the destination after discharge (p < 0.05). More detailed information is required to investigate the reason for these observed variations in the rates of complications. If future studies confirm an association between low-volume providers and an adverse outcome, performance of some types of elective total hip replacements at regional centers should be considered.
自20世纪70年代末以来,对于各种手术,已记录了医疗服务提供者(医院或外科医生)所实施手术的数量与手术结果之间的经验关系。本研究考察了外科医生和医院实施髋关节置换手术的数量与术后并发症发生率之间的关系。利用一个全州范围的医院出院登记系统来确定在1988年至1991年间接受择期髋关节置换手术的患者。接受过翻修手术、因急诊入院或入院时被诊断为骨折或恶性肿瘤的患者被排除。共有7936名符合条件的患者接受了8774次髋关节置换手术。随后确定了在研究队列中至少护理过一名患者的每家医院和每位外科医生在1987年至1991年间实施的所有髋关节置换手术的年均数量。将手术并发症发生率建模为外科医生或医院所实施手术数量(外科医生或医院手术量)的函数,并对患者年龄、性别、合并症和手术诊断进行了调整。我们注意到,手术量低的医疗服务提供者与手术量高的医疗服务提供者在病例组合方面存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。一般来说,手术量低于第40百分位数的外科医生和医院所管理的患者在年龄、合并症和诊断方面具有更不利的风险特征。即使对病例组合进行了调整,每年平均实施少于两次髋关节置换手术(低手术量外科医生)的外科医生与较差的手术结果之间仍存在显著关系(p < 0.05)。由这些低手术量外科医生管理的患者往往死亡率更高、感染更多、翻修手术率更高,且在初次住院期间出现更严重的并发症。住院时间与外科医生手术量呈负相关,与医院手术量呈正相关。即使在对与患者相关的因素以及住院时间、手术年份和出院后的去向进行调整之后,医院收费仍与医院手术量呈负相关(p < 0.05)。需要更详细的信息来调查这些观察到的并发症发生率差异的原因。如果未来的研究证实手术量低的医疗服务提供者与不良手术结果之间存在关联,那么应考虑在区域中心进行某些类型的择期全髋关节置换手术。