Reiffel J A, Hahn E, Hartz V, Reiter M J
Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1048-53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00045-3.
In the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial, d,l-sotalol was associated with a lower arrhythmia recurrence and mortality than class I antiarrhythmic drugs. To further evaluate the relative efficacy of d,I-sotalol compared with class I drugs, and to assess the relative importance of its class II (beta-blocking) and class III effects, 6-year arrhythmia recurrence and mortality in patients receiving sotalol were compared with those in patients receiving class I drugs, subdivided according to whether they also received coadministered beta blockers. Relative efficacy was also determined for sotalol and for class I drugs as stratified by the presence/absence of prior drug failure. Arrhythmia recurrence was lower for the 84 patients receiving sotalol than for patients given class I agents with (n = 28) (p = 0.008) or without (n = 184) (p = 0.001) alpha beta blocker. Mortality was lower for patients taking sotalol than for those given a class I drug without alpha beta blocker (p = 0.034), but similar (p = 0.835) if alpha beta blocker was also administered. In contrast to class I drugs, which had lower efficacy rates when prior drug trials had failed, sotalol maintained its efficacy despite prior drug failures preceding or during the ESVEM trial. Both class II and III actions in the ESVEM trial were important to the clinical superiority of sotalol in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
在电生理研究与心电图监测(ESVEM)试验中,与I类抗心律失常药物相比,d,l-索他洛尔与较低的心律失常复发率和死亡率相关。为了进一步评估d,l-索他洛尔与I类药物相比的相对疗效,并评估其II类(β受体阻滞)和III类作用的相对重要性,将接受索他洛尔治疗的患者与接受I类药物治疗的患者(根据是否同时接受β受体阻滞剂进行细分)的6年心律失常复发率和死亡率进行了比较。还根据既往药物治疗是否失败对索他洛尔和I类药物的相对疗效进行了分层测定。接受索他洛尔治疗的84例患者的心律失常复发率低于接受I类药物治疗的患者,无论是否同时使用αβ受体阻滞剂(使用αβ受体阻滞剂的28例患者,p = 0.008;未使用αβ受体阻滞剂的184例患者,p = 0.001)。服用索他洛尔的患者死亡率低于未使用αβ受体阻滞剂的I类药物治疗患者(p = 0.034),但如果同时使用αβ受体阻滞剂,则死亡率相似(p = 0.835)。与I类药物不同,I类药物在既往药物试验失败时疗效较低,而索他洛尔在ESVEM试验之前或期间尽管有既往药物治疗失败但仍保持其疗效。ESVEM试验中的II类和III类作用对于索他洛尔在治疗室性快速性心律失常方面的临床优势都很重要。