• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.

作者信息

Krejci I, Besek M, Lutz F

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zurich University, Switzerland.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1994 Feb;7(1):27-30.

PMID:9115675
Abstract

Thirty-nine conventional posterior composite fillings were placed according to the three-sited light curing technique using Tetric, a fine hybrid composite material, and Syntac, a dentin adhesive. Six and 12 months later, the restorations were clinically evaluated using macrophotographs. A quantitative marginal analysis was also done immediately after placing the restorations and at the two recall intervals using a replica technique and an SEM. Contour, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity and bulk fractures all rated "A" at 12 months. Marginal discoloration and color match were scored as 97% "A" and 3% "B". The SEM evaluation of the marginal adaptation showed 95% "continuous margin" initially and 93% at 6 months and 89% at 12 months. No statistical difference was found between the initial findings and the 12-month recall between premolars and molars, nor between small and large restorations. The overall performance of the new composite material during the 12-month observation period was satisfactory.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results.
Am J Dent. 1994 Feb;7(1):27-30.
2
Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.直接树脂复合材料修复体与间接复合嵌体:一年的结果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 May 1;11(3):025-32.
3
One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.两种不同类型复合树脂用于后牙的一年临床评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 May 1;9(4):26-33.
4
Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.乳牙复合树脂和复合体修复体的临床评估:24个月结果
J Dent. 2006 Jul;34(6):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
5
Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.后牙复合树脂修复体直接覆盖牙尖的临床评价
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00033.x.
6
Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.不同后牙树脂复合材料的临床评估:一份7年报告。
Quintessence Int. 2003 Jun;34(6):418-26.
7
Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.用于修复颈部病变的牙齿颜色填充材料:一项24个月的随访研究。
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):251-8.
8
Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.在牙科诊所使用聚酸改性复合树脂对乳磨牙进行II类修复:两年临床评估结果
Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):259-64.
9
Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.牙本质粘结强度和边缘适应性:直接复合树脂与陶瓷嵌体的比较
Oper Dent. 1999 May-Jun;24(3):147-55.
10
A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.非龋性V类洞病变中树脂复合体与复合体的临床评估。3年随访。
Am J Dent. 2008 Feb;21(1):49-52.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.体外研究不同修复材料在可摘局部义齿铸造环形卡环下的性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Dec;16(6):1659-67. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0653-5. Epub 2011 Dec 17.