Suppr超能文献

自发性糖尿病胰岛素依赖型BB/爱丁堡大鼠体内一氧化氮代谢改变的体内和体外证据。

In vivo and in vitro evidence of altered nitric oxide metabolism in the spontaneously diabetic, insulin-dependent BB/Edinburgh rat.

作者信息

Lindsay R M, Peet R S, Wilkie G S, Rossiter S P, Smith W, Baird J D, Williams B C

机构信息

Metabolic Unit, Western General Hospitals NHS Trust, Edinburgh.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 1997 Jan;120(1):1-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700862.

Abstract
  1. Altered vasoreactivity may contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular complications. This study investigated the effect of (a) insulin-related diabetes, and (b) chronic in vivo administration of N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine ester (L-NAME), a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, on mean arterial pressure and in vitro vascular reactivity to noradrenaline in mesenteric arterial bed preparations from spontaneously diabetic, insulin-dependent and treated BB rats, the best animal model of insulin-dependent mellitus (IDDM) currently available. Four groups of animals from the Edinburgh colony (BB/E) of spontaneous diabetic BB rats were studied: age-matched (mean +/- s.e. mean = 156 +/- 2d) non-diabetic (glycated haemoglobin = 3.8 +/- 0.1%) and insulin-treated diabetic (glycated haemoglobin = 6.2 +/- 0.5%; duration of diabetes = 56 +/- 4 d) groups were either L-NAME treated (oral dose = 27 +/- 1 mg kg-1 d-1; duration of treatment from 30 until 153 days of age) or untreated. Although our diabetic BB/E rats do not achieve overall normoglycaemia, individual adjustment of the daily insulin dose administered to every diabetic rat achieves better glycaemic control than previous groups studying altered vascular reactivity and endothelial dysfunction in this animal model of diabetes. 2. Mean arterial pressure (measured directly via indwelling carotid arterial cannulae) was not significantly different between non-diabetic (116 +/- 3 mmHg; n = 10) and diabetic (122 +/- 2 mmHg; n = 12) BB/E rats. L-NAME treatment significantly (P < 0.001) increased mean arterial pressure in both groups (165 +/- 6 mmHg; n = 9 and 142 +/- 4 mmHg; n = 6 respectively) but the degree of hypertension observed in L-NAME-treated diabetic rats was significantly (P < 0.01) attenuated compared to non-diabetic rats treated with L-NAME. 3. Mesenteric arterial bed preparations were cannulated under anesthesia, excised and intralumenally perfused ex vivo with noradrenaline (0.2-20 microM). Basal perfusion pressures were not significantly different in mesentery preparations from non-diabetic (27.0 +/- 2.6 mmHg) and diabetic (27.1 +/- 3.2 mmHg) BB/E rats. There was no significant difference in maximal response above basal perfusion pressure (MAX) or pEC50, defined as the negative log of the agonist concentration required to give 50% of the maximal response above basal perfusion pressure, to noradrenaline in untreated non-diabetic (166 +/- 7 mmHg and 5.74 +/- 0.05 respectively) and diabetic (170 +/- 11 mmHg and 5.59 +/- 0.05) BB/E rats. 4. In vivo treatment of non-diabetic and diabetic BB/E rats with L-NAME had no significant effect on basal perfusion pressure (25.9 +/- 4.3 mmHg and 28.5 +/- 3.9 mmHg respectively). L-NAME treatment in vivo increased (P < 0.001) MAX to noradrenaline of non-diabetic rats (224 +/- 8 mmHg) but did not affect the value for diabetic rats (178 +/- 14 mmHg). L-NAME treatment did not alter after the pEC50 values in either group (5.71 +/- 0.05 and 5.65 +/- 0.05). 5. Consistent with previous studies using vascular preparations from spontaneously diabetic BB rats, mesentery preparations from diabetic BB/E rats (n = 12) exhibited a significantly reduced vasodilator response to acetylcholine (F value = 4.4, P < 0.05) across the concentration range studied compared to non-diabetic BB/E rats (n = 12) although there was no significant difference in maximal relaxation (diabetic 53.1 +/- 4.3% vs non-diabetic 55.7 +/- 5.5%) or pEC50, (diabetic 6.92 +/- 0.25 vs non-diabetic 7.49 +/- 0.22). There was no significant (F value = 0.8, P > 0.1) difference in the response to GTN between preparations from non-diabetic and diabetic rats (maximal relaxation: 49.6 +/- 3.7% vs 48.5 +/- 4.3%; pEC50: 7.84 +/- 0.12 vs 7.89 +/- 0.22 respectively). 6. In conclusion, vascular responsiveness to noradrenaline is not impaired in spontaneously diabetic BB/E rats with significantly better glycaemic control than those used in previous studies. However, following chronic L-NAME treatment, diabetic BB/E rats exhibit attenuated hypertension and an absence of enhanced vascular responsiveness to noradrenaline in vitro compared to similarly treated non-diabetic rats. These results, together with the significantly impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and unchanged endothelium-independent vasodilatation in vitro of preparations from diabetic BB/E rats, are consistent with the hypothesis that functional changes in the synthesis and metabolism of NO (rather than altered vascular responsiveness to NO) occur in diabetes. Our results indicate that good glycaemic control alone is insufficient to prevent these abnormalities in NO availability and further studies to characterize the origin of these changes are necessary.
摘要
  1. 血管反应性改变可能在糖尿病血管并发症的发病机制中起重要作用。本研究调查了(a)胰岛素相关糖尿病,以及(b)长期体内给予一氧化氮(NO)合酶抑制剂N(ω)-硝基-L-精氨酸乙酯(L-NAME),对来自自发性糖尿病、胰岛素依赖型且经过治疗的BB大鼠肠系膜动脉床标本的平均动脉压和体外血管对去甲肾上腺素反应性的影响,BB大鼠是目前可用的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)的最佳动物模型。对来自爱丁堡种群(BB/E)的自发性糖尿病BB大鼠的四组动物进行了研究:年龄匹配(平均±标准误=156±2天)的非糖尿病组(糖化血红蛋白=3.8±0.1%)和胰岛素治疗的糖尿病组(糖化血红蛋白=6.2±0.5%;糖尿病病程=56±4天),每组又分为L-NAME治疗组(口服剂量=27±1mg kg-1 d-1;治疗持续时间从30天至153天龄)和未治疗组。尽管我们的糖尿病BB/E大鼠未实现总体血糖正常,但对每只糖尿病大鼠的每日胰岛素剂量进行个体调整,比之前在该糖尿病动物模型中研究血管反应性改变和内皮功能障碍的组能实现更好的血糖控制。2. 非糖尿病(116±3mmHg;n=10)和糖尿病(122±2mmHg;n=12)BB/E大鼠之间的平均动脉压(通过留置颈动脉插管直接测量)无显著差异。L-NAME治疗显著(P<0.001)升高了两组的平均动脉压(分别为165±6mmHg;n=9和142±4mmHg;n=6),但与用L-NAME治疗的非糖尿病大鼠相比,L-NAME治疗的糖尿病大鼠中观察到的高血压程度显著(P<0.01)减轻。3. 在麻醉下将肠系膜动脉床标本插管,切除后在体外管腔内用去甲肾上腺素(0.2 - 20μM)灌注。非糖尿病(27.0±2.6mmHg)和糖尿病(27.1±3.2mmHg)BB/E大鼠的肠系膜标本的基础灌注压无显著差异。在未治疗的非糖尿病(分别为166±7mmHg和5.74±0.05)和糖尿病(170±11mmHg和5.59±0.05)BB/E大鼠中,高于基础灌注压的最大反应(MAX)或pEC50(定义为产生高于基础灌注压的最大反应的50%所需激动剂浓度的负对数)对去甲肾上腺素的反应无显著差异。4. 用L-NAME对非糖尿病和糖尿病BB/E大鼠进行体内治疗对基础灌注压无显著影响(分别为25.9±4.3mmHg和28.5±3.9mmHg)。体内L-NAME治疗增加了(P<0.001)非糖尿病大鼠对去甲肾上腺素的MAX(224±8mmHg),但对糖尿病大鼠的值(178±14mmHg)无影响。L-NAME治疗未改变两组的pEC50值(分别为5.71±0.05和5.65±0.05)。5. 与先前使用自发性糖尿病BB大鼠血管标本的研究一致,与非糖尿病BB/E大鼠(n=12)相比,糖尿病BB/E大鼠(n=12)的肠系膜标本在研究的浓度范围内对乙酰胆碱的血管舒张反应显著降低(F值=4.4,P<0.05),尽管最大舒张(糖尿病组53.1±4.3%对非糖尿病组55.7±5.5%)或pEC50(糖尿病组6.92±0.25对非糖尿病组7.49±0.22)无显著差异。非糖尿病和糖尿病大鼠的标本对硝酸甘油的反应无显著(F值=0.8,P>0.1)差异(最大舒张:49.6±3.7%对48.5±4.3%;pEC50:7.84±0.12对7.89±0.22)。6. 总之,与先前研究中使用的大鼠相比,血糖控制显著更好的自发性糖尿病BB/E大鼠对去甲肾上腺素的血管反应性未受损。然而,在长期L-NAME治疗后,与同样治疗的非糖尿病大鼠相比,糖尿病BB/E大鼠表现出高血压减轻,且体外对去甲肾上腺素的血管反应性未增强。这些结果,连同糖尿病BB/E大鼠标本体外显著受损的内皮依赖性血管舒张和未改变的内皮非依赖性血管舒张,与糖尿病中发生NO合成和代谢的功能改变(而非对NO的血管反应性改变)这一假设一致。我们的结果表明,仅良好的血糖控制不足以预防NO可用性的这些异常,有必要进一步研究以确定这些变化的起源。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验