Suppr超能文献

用于窄发散角光纤的凝固性激光前列腺切除术技术

Techniques of coagulation laser prostatectomy for narrow divergence angle fibers.

作者信息

Milam D F

机构信息

Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2765, USA.

出版信息

Tech Urol. 1996 Spring;2(1):34-9.

PMID:9118400
Abstract

Although laser prostatectomy has become an accepted technique for the treatment of obstructive prostatism, considerable debate remains about which laser prostatectomy method to use in various treatment situations. This article discusses the different methods of noncontact side-firing coagulation laser prostatectomy using narrow divergence angle fibers (< 30 degrees). Static treatment strategies that have been successfully employed with widely divergent beams are not appropriate for fibers producing narrow divergence angle beams. Narrow divergence angle beams produce a small diameter spot on the prostatic urethra and far larger power density. Additionally, neodymium/yttrium aluminum garnet light scatters relatively poorly within prostatic tissue. Most light continues along the path of through transmission until ultimate tissue absorption and conversion into heat. The width and total volume of the coagulated lesion is therefore limited when using a narrow divergence angle fiber to produce static lesions. Probe movement is essential. Rapid (> 2 mm/s) probe movement produces only superficial coagulation. An initial dwell period of approximately 3 s is also important to maximize coagulated tissue volume. Scanning strategies where the fiber is moved through the prostatic urethra in longitudinal and radial directions are discussed and compared. Radial and longitudinal scanning methods produce similar coagulation defects. Treatment using a rocking motion within a limited volume of tissue may increase coagulation depth. No technique is ideal for all clinical situations. Vaporization prostatectomy or contact laser transurethral incision of the prostate is appropriate for primary treatment of glands < 30 g or as adjunctive therapy to facilitate early catheter removal. Alternative treatment methods are compared to noncontact coagulation prostatectomy.

摘要

尽管激光前列腺切除术已成为治疗梗阻性前列腺增生的一种公认技术,但对于在各种治疗情况下应使用哪种激光前列腺切除术方法,仍存在相当大的争议。本文讨论了使用窄发散角光纤(<30度)的非接触侧射凝固激光前列腺切除术的不同方法。已成功应用于宽发散光束的静态治疗策略不适用于产生窄发散角光束的光纤。窄发散角光束在前列腺尿道上产生的光斑直径较小,功率密度大得多。此外,钕/钇铝石榴石光在前列腺组织内的散射相对较差。大多数光继续沿透射路径传播,直到最终被组织吸收并转化为热量。因此,当使用窄发散角光纤产生静态损伤时,凝固损伤的宽度和总体积是有限的。探头移动至关重要。快速(>2mm/s)的探头移动只会产生表面凝固。大约3秒的初始停留时间对于最大化凝固组织体积也很重要。本文讨论并比较了光纤在纵向和径向上穿过前列腺尿道的扫描策略。径向和纵向扫描方法产生的凝固缺陷相似。在有限的组织体积内采用摇摆运动进行治疗可能会增加凝固深度。没有一种技术适用于所有临床情况。汽化前列腺切除术或接触式激光经尿道前列腺切开术适用于<30g腺体的初始治疗或作为促进早期拔除导管的辅助治疗。将替代治疗方法与非接触凝固前列腺切除术进行了比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验