Joliot E, Vanlemmens C, Kerleau M, Le Gales C, Woronoff-Lemsi M C, Flori Y A, Seror V, Hrusovsky S, Monnet E, Bresson-Hadni S, Miguet J P
Service d'Hépatologie, CHU, Besancon.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996;20(11):958-67.
Chronic active hepatitis C is an important public health issue because of its prevalence, evolution, and overall cost. Treatment by recombinant alpha-interferon is both expensive and exacting and its effectiveness is limited. We report the results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of alpha-interferon treatment in patients with chronic active hepatitis C.
Direct medical costs of caring for patients with chronic active hepatitis C and its complications, based on treatment or no treatment, were assessed with retrospective data collected from the files of 137 hospital patients. Seventy-seven patients were treated with alpha-interferon between 1988 and 1994. The overall costs of caring for chronic active hepatitis C patients, without treatment or with alpha-interferon treatment (3 millions units three times a week) for 6 months (strategy A), 12 months (strategy B), or 12 months but discontinuing treatment when there was no response (strategy C), was reported and compared to the respective effectiveness of each.
With an actualization rate of 5%, the real overall cost of caring for a chronic active hepatitis C patient was 143290 FF. Considering the contraindication rate (15%), the treatment acceptance (85%), the response rate to treatment (50%), and the prolonged response rate (25 to 30%), treating patients with strategy A induced a real overall cost of caring to 140731 FF to avoid 0.11 cases of cirrhosis, to 150277 FF to avoid 0.13 cases of cirrhosis with strategy B, and to 136947 FF to avoid 0.13 cases of cirrhosis with strategy C.
Alpha-interferon treatment in patients with chronic active hepatitis C provides a long-term saving compared to cases which receive no treatment. Strategy C was the most cost-effective, inducing the reduction of both the number of cases of cirrhosis and the cost of care.
慢性活动性丙型肝炎因其患病率、病情发展及总体成本,成为一个重要的公共卫生问题。重组α干扰素治疗既昂贵又严苛,且其疗效有限。我们报告了对慢性活动性丙型肝炎患者进行α干扰素治疗的成本效益分析结果。
基于治疗或未治疗情况,通过从137例住院患者病历中收集的回顾性数据,评估护理慢性活动性丙型肝炎患者及其并发症的直接医疗成本。1988年至1994年间,77例患者接受了α干扰素治疗。报告了护理慢性活动性丙型肝炎患者的总体成本,包括未治疗、接受α干扰素治疗(每周三次,每次300万单位)6个月(策略A)、12个月(策略B)或12个月但无反应时停止治疗(策略C)的情况,并比较了每种策略的相应疗效。
实际贴现率为5%时,护理一名慢性活动性丙型肝炎患者的实际总体成本为143290法郎。考虑到禁忌率(15%)、治疗接受率(85%)、治疗反应率(50%)和延长反应率(25%至30%),采用策略A治疗患者的实际总体护理成本为140731法郎,可避免0.11例肝硬化;采用策略B为150277法郎,可避免0.13例肝硬化;采用策略C为136947法郎,可避免0.13例肝硬化。
与未接受治疗的病例相比,对慢性活动性丙型肝炎患者进行α干扰素治疗可实现长期节省。策略C是最具成本效益的,既能减少肝硬化病例数,又能降低护理成本。