Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药治疗神经性疼痛的系统评价。

A systematic review of antidepressants in neuropathic pain.

作者信息

McQuay H J, Tramèr M, Nye B A, Carroll D, Wiffen P J, Moore R A

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Pain. 1996 Dec;68(2-3):217-27. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03140-5.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants in neuropathic pain. In a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, the main outcomes were global judgements, pain relief or fall in pain intensity which approximated to more than 50% pain relief, and information about minor and major adverse effects. Dichotomous data for effectiveness and adverse effects were analysed using odds ratio and number needed-to-treat (NNT) methods. Twenty-one placebo-controlled treatments in 17 randomised controlled trials were included, involving 10 antidepressants. In six of 13 diabetic neuropathy studies the odds ratios showed significant benefit compared with placebo. The combined odds ratio was 3.6 (95% CI 2.5-5.2), with a NNT for benefit of 3 (2.4-4). In two of three postherpetic neuralgia studies the odds ratios showed significant benefit, and the combined odds ratio was 6.8 (3.5-14.3), with a NNT of 2.3 (1.7-3.3). In two atypical facial pain studies the combined odds ratio for benefit was 4.1 (2.3-7.5), with a NNT of 2.8 (2-4.7). Only one of three central pain studies had analysable dichotomous data. The NNT point estimate was 1.7. Comparisons of tricyclic antidepressants did not show any significant difference between them; they were significantly more effective than benzodiazepines in the three comparisons available. Paroxetine and mianserin were less effective than imipramine. For 11 of the 21 placebo-controlled treatments there was dichotomous information on minor adverse effects; combining across pain syndromes the NNT for minor (noted in published report) adverse effects was 3.7 (2.9-5.2). Information on major (drug-related study withdrawal) adverse effects was available from 19 reports; combining across pain syndromes the NNT for major adverse effects was 22 (13.5-58). Antidepressants are effective in relieving neuropathic pain. Compared with placebo, of 100 patients with neuropathic pain who are given antidepressants, 30 will obtain more than 50% pain relief, 30 will have minor adverse reactions and four will have to stop treatment because of major adverse effects. With very similar results for anticonvulsants it is still unclear which drug class should be first choice. Treatment would be improved if we could harness the dramatic improvement seen on placebo in some of the trials.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾抗抑郁药治疗神经性疼痛的有效性和安全性。在一项对随机对照试验的系统评价中,主要结局包括整体评估、疼痛缓解或疼痛强度下降(相当于疼痛缓解超过50%),以及有关轻微和严重不良反应的信息。使用比值比和需治疗人数(NNT)方法分析有效性和不良反应的二分数据。纳入了17项随机对照试验中的21种安慰剂对照治疗,涉及10种抗抑郁药。在13项糖尿病性神经病变研究中的6项中,与安慰剂相比,比值比显示出显著益处。合并后的比值比为3.6(95%置信区间2.5 - 5.2),获益的NNT为3(2.4 - 4)。在3项带状疱疹后神经痛研究中的2项中,比值比显示出显著益处,合并后的比值比为6.8(3.5 - 14.3),NNT为2.3(1.7 - 3.3)。在2项非典型面部疼痛研究中,获益的合并比值比为4.1(2.3 - 7.5),NNT为2.8(2 - 4.7)。3项中枢性疼痛研究中只有1项有可分析的二分数据。NNT点估计值为1.7。三环类抗抑郁药之间的比较未显示出任何显著差异;在可进行的3次比较中,它们比苯二氮䓬类药物显著更有效。帕罗西汀和米安色林比丙咪嗪效果差。21种安慰剂对照治疗中有11种有关于轻微不良反应的二分信息;综合不同疼痛综合征,轻微(在已发表报告中提及)不良反应的NNT为3.7(2.9 - 5.2)。19份报告提供了关于严重(与药物相关的研究撤药)不良反应的信息;综合不同疼痛综合征,严重不良反应的NNT为22(13.5 - 58)。抗抑郁药在缓解神经性疼痛方面有效。与安慰剂相比,每100名接受抗抑郁药治疗的神经性疼痛患者中,30名将获得超过50%的疼痛缓解,30名将出现轻微不良反应,4名将因严重不良反应而不得不停止治疗。抗惊厥药的结果非常相似,目前仍不清楚哪种药物类别应作为首选。如果我们能够利用一些试验中安慰剂组出现的显著改善,治疗将会得到改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验