Stark U, Stark G, Kasper K, Schwarzl I, Decrinis M, Pilger E, Tritthart H A
Department of Internal Medicine, Karl Franzens-University, Graz, Austria.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Jan;20(1 Pt 1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04810.x.
Propafenone and lidocaine have a rate dependent negative dromotropic effect on intraventricular conduction. We investigated the use dependent actions of propafenone and lidocaine on intraventricular conduction in isolated guinea pig hearts perfused by the method of Langendorff. Of primary interest was how the number of stimuli of the conditioning train (S1) might influence the ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) when refractoriness is assessed at a high pacing rate. Propafenone (0.3 microM) and lidocaine (50 microM) caused a comparable prolongation of the intraventricular conduction time during sinus rhythm. During ventricular pacing in the presence of propafenone an abrupt decrease of the pacing cycle length (220 to 120 ms) resulted in an initial peak of rate dependent prolongation of the QRS interval that subsequently decreased to a stable steady-state level. Lidocaine also induced a rate dependent increase of the intraventricular conduction time up to a steady-state level. The time constant, characterizing the changes of the intraventricular conduction time after shortening the ventricular pacing cycle length from 220 to 120 ms was significantly (P < 0.01) longer in the presence of propafenone (tau = 31 +/- 4 beats; mean +/- SEM; n = 11) than for lidocaine (tau = 3 +/- 1; n = 10). Both drugs caused the greatest increase of the VERP when the number of conditioning stimuli (S1, interstimulus interval = 120 ms) was in the range of their respective time constant. However, when the number of conditioning stimuli was further increased, VERP progressively diminished. These effects may be explained by a shortening of the action potential during high rates that results in a decreased binding of propafenone to Na+ channels and by the direct shortening of repolarization period by lidocaine (Class IB drug).
普罗帕酮和利多卡因对心室内传导具有频率依赖性负性变传导作用。我们采用Langendorff灌注法,研究了普罗帕酮和利多卡因对离体豚鼠心脏心室内传导的使用依赖性作用。主要关注的是,当在高起搏频率下评估不应期时,条件刺激序列(S1)的刺激次数如何影响心室有效不应期(VERP)。普罗帕酮(0.3微摩尔)和利多卡因(50微摩尔)在窦性心律时可使心室内传导时间出现类似程度的延长。在普罗帕酮存在的情况下进行心室起搏时,起搏周期长度突然缩短(从220毫秒至120毫秒)会导致QRS间期出现频率依赖性延长的初始峰值,随后降至稳定的稳态水平。利多卡因也可使心室内传导时间出现频率依赖性增加,直至达到稳态水平。在将心室起搏周期长度从220毫秒缩短至120毫秒后,表征心室内传导时间变化的时间常数,在普罗帕酮存在时(τ = 31 ± 4次搏动;均值 ± 标准误;n = 11)显著(P < 0.01)长于利多卡因(τ = 3 ± 1;n = 10)。当条件刺激次数(S1,刺激间期 = 120毫秒)处于各自时间常数范围内时,两种药物均可使VERP出现最大程度的增加。然而,当条件刺激次数进一步增加时,VERP会逐渐减小。这些效应可能是由于高频率时动作电位缩短,导致普罗帕酮与钠通道的结合减少,以及利多卡因(ⅠB类药物)直接缩短复极化期所致。