Keffer J H
Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9072, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Apr;107(4):398-409. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/107.4.398.
Presented with an ever-increasing array of potential tests of myocardial injury, the clinical pathologist in conjunction with physicians in primary care, cardiology, and other clinical disciplines must evolve a practical approach for each individual institution. This involves identifying the tests available for immediate (stat) or timed performance, the appropriate patients for whom testing is desired, the schedule of frequency and duration of testing, and the manner in which the test results are to be interpreted. A guideline is presented to address these issues with the purpose of stimulating local adoption of an appropriately modified version to accommodate the current state of the art. Selective choice of an early marker, creatine kinase MB by mass immunoassay, in conjunction with cardiac troponin I (cTnI), is proposed as the appropriate combination of laboratory tests that emphasizes the cardiospecificity of cTnI for the variety of applications in which the "cardiac profile" formerly has been used, including the spectrum of clinical settings in which suspected myocardial infarction must be considered. A rationale is provided with emphasis on the relative merit of the various biochemical markers in contrast with other modalities for evaluating suspected myocardial injury.
面对越来越多的心肌损伤潜在检测方法,临床病理学家必须与基层医疗、心脏病学及其他临床学科的医生合作,为每个机构制定切实可行的方法。这包括确定可立即(急诊)或定时进行的检测项目、适合进行检测的患者、检测的频率和持续时间安排,以及解读检测结果的方式。本文提出一项指南来解决这些问题,目的是促使各地采用适当修改后的版本以适应目前的技术水平。建议选择早期标志物——通过免疫比浊法检测的肌酸激酶同工酶MB,结合心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI),作为实验室检测的合适组合,强调cTnI在各种应用中的心脏特异性,这些应用以前使用的是“心脏谱”,包括必须考虑疑似心肌梗死的一系列临床情况。本文给出了一个基本原理,强调了各种生化标志物相对于其他评估疑似心肌损伤方法的相对优点。