Kreindel S, Rosetti R, Goldberg R, Savageau J, Yarzebski J, Gore J, Russo A, Bigelow C
Communicable Disease Bureau, Massachusetts Department of Public Health Boston, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Apr 14;157(7):758-62.
Several studies have suggested that type of medical insurance coverage is associated with hospital utilization rates and receipt of selected diagnostic or treatment approaches. To our knowledge no studies, however, have examined the relation between medical insurance coverage and short-term outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from a multihospital, community-wide perspective.
To examine the association between medical insurance coverage and in-hospital case-fatality rates as well as length of hospital stay following AMI.
The study sample consisted of 3735 residents of the Worcester, Mass, metropolitan area hospitalized with validated AMI during 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, and 1993 at all metropolitan Worcester hospitals. Data were obtained from the review of medical records. Patients were stratified into 5 medical insurance groups for purposes of analysis: private or commercial (n = 711), Medicaid (n = 101), Medicare (n = 1991), health maintenance organization (n = 741), and self-pay or other (n = 191). Crude and multivariable-adjusted analyses were used to examine the relation between medical insurance coverage and length of hospital stay and in-hospital case-fatality rates following AMI.
In-hospital case-fatality rates during the period under study were 7.7%, 11.9%, 21.4%, 9.3%, and 10.0% in the 5 medical insurance groups, respectively. After adjusting for several factors that may affect in-hospital mortality, relative to the referent group of private or commercial insurance patients (odds ratio, 1.0), the multivariable-adjusted odds for dying during the acute hospitalization were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.36) for health maintenance organization patients, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.55-2.68) for Medical patients, 1.25 (95% CI, 0.85-1.84) for Medicare patients, and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.60-2.44) for self-pay or other patients. The mean length of hospitalization after excluding patients with a prolonged hospitalization was 10.1 days for private or commercial insurance patients, 9.4 days for health maintenance organization patients, 10.9 days for Medicaid patients, 11.1 days for Medicare patients, and 9.8 days for self-pay or other patients. No significant differences in the average duration of hospitalization were seen between the medical insurance groups after controlling for potential confounding variables.
The results of this population-based study suggest that patient insurance status is not significantly associated with either length of hospital stay or short-term mortality following AMI. Other demographic and clinical prognostic factors appear to be more important predictors of short-term outcome in this patient population.
多项研究表明,医疗保险类型与医院利用率以及某些诊断或治疗方法的使用情况相关。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究从多医院、社区范围的角度考察医疗保险与急性心肌梗死(AMI)后短期预后之间的关系。
考察医疗保险与AMI住院病死率以及住院时间之间的关联。
研究样本包括1986年、1988年、1990年、1991年和1993年在伍斯特市所有大都会医院因确诊AMI住院的马萨诸塞州伍斯特市大都会地区的3735名居民。数据通过病历审查获得。为进行分析,患者被分为5个医疗保险组:私人或商业保险(n = 711)、医疗补助(n = 101)、医疗保险(n = 1991)、健康维护组织(n = 741)以及自费或其他(n = 191)。采用粗分析和多变量调整分析来考察医疗保险与AMI住院时间和住院病死率之间的关系。
在研究期间,5个医疗保险组的住院病死率分别为7.7%、11.9%、21.4%、9.3%和10.0%。在对可能影响住院死亡率的多个因素进行调整后,相对于私人或商业保险患者的参照组(比值比,1.0),健康维护组织患者急性住院期间死亡的多变量调整后比值为0.87(95%置信区间[CI],0.56 - 1.36),医疗补助患者为1.22(95% CI,0.55 - 2.68),医疗保险患者为1.25(95% CI,0.85 - 1.84),自费或其他患者为1.21(95% CI,0.60 - 2.44)。排除住院时间延长的患者后,私人或商业保险患者的平均住院时间为10.1天,健康维护组织患者为9.4天,医疗补助患者为10.9天,医疗保险患者为11.1天,自费或其他患者为9.8天。在控制潜在混杂变量后,各医疗保险组之间的平均住院时长无显著差异。
这项基于人群的研究结果表明,患者的保险状况与AMI后的住院时间或短期死亡率均无显著关联。其他人口统计学和临床预后因素似乎是该患者群体短期预后更重要的预测因素。