Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Department of Allied Health Sciences, College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1543-1550. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4555-y. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
Barriers to healthcare are common in the USA and may result in worse outcomes among hospital survivors of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
To examine the relationship between barriers to healthcare and 2-year mortality after hospital discharge for an ACS.
Longitudinal study.
Survivors of an ACS hospitalization were recruited from 6 medical centers in central Massachusetts and Georgia in 2011-2013.
Study participants with a confirmed ACS reported whether they had a financial-related healthcare barrier, no usual source of care, or a transportation-related healthcare barrier around the time of hospital admission.
None.
Cox regression analyses calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for 2-year all-cause mortality for the three healthcare barriers while controlling for several demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics.
The mean age of study participants (n = 2008) was 62 years, 33% were women, and 77% were non-Hispanic white. One third of patients reported a financial barrier, 17% lacked a usual source of care, and 12% had a transportation barrier. Five percent (n = 100) died within 2 years after hospital discharge. Compared to patients without these barriers, those lacking a usual source of care and with barriers to transportation experienced significantly higher mortality (aHRs 1.40, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.51 and 1.46, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89, respectively). Financial barriers were not associated with all-cause mortality (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.06).
Observational study with other unmeasured potentially confounding prognostic factors.
Absence of an established usual source of care and inconsistent transportation availability were associated with a higher risk for dying after an ACS. Patients with these barriers to follow-up care may benefit from more intensive follow-up and support.
在美国,医疗保健障碍很常见,这可能导致急性冠脉综合征(ACS)住院幸存者的预后更差。
研究 ACS 住院后医疗保健障碍与 2 年死亡率之间的关系。
纵向研究。
2011 年至 2013 年,在马萨诸塞州中部和佐治亚州的 6 家医疗中心招募 ACS 住院幸存者。
报告 ACS 住院时是否存在与财务相关的医疗保健障碍、无常规医疗服务来源或与交通相关的医疗保健障碍的患者。
无。
使用 Cox 回归分析计算了三种医疗保健障碍的 2 年全因死亡率的调整后危险比(aHR),同时控制了几个人口统计学、临床和社会心理特征。
研究参与者(n=2008)的平均年龄为 62 岁,33%为女性,77%为非西班牙裔白人。三分之一的患者报告存在财务障碍,17%缺乏常规医疗服务来源,12%存在交通障碍。5%(n=100)在出院后 2 年内死亡。与没有这些障碍的患者相比,缺乏常规医疗服务来源和存在交通障碍的患者死亡率显著更高(aHR 分别为 1.40[95%CI 1.30 至 1.51]和 1.46[95%CI 1.13 至 1.89])。财务障碍与全因死亡率无关(aHR 0.79[95%CI 0.60 至 1.06])。
观察性研究,存在其他未测量的潜在混杂预后因素。
缺乏既定的常规医疗服务来源和交通条件不稳定与 ACS 后死亡风险增加相关。这些后续护理障碍患者可能受益于更强化的随访和支持。