• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯性肾单位阻断可打破水肿状态下对利尿剂的抵抗。

Sequential nephron blockade breaks resistance to diuretics in edematous states.

作者信息

Knauf H, Mutschler E

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik I, St. Bernward Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997 Mar;29(3):367-72. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199703000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00005344-199703000-00010
PMID:9125675
Abstract

Diuretic therapy in edematous diseases often yields an inadequate natriuretic response ("diuretic resistance"). To study the functional changes in patients with congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis with ascites, and nephrotic syndrome, characterized by a reduced effective arterial blood volume (EABV), different diuretic strategies were studied. It was shown that monotherapy with hydrochlorothiazide or furosemide was followed by an inadequate natriuretic response. Correlation of diuretic response with pretreatment fractional sodium excretion of the patient revealed a clear-cut interdependency: Those patients were resistant whose FENa+ was greatly below normal (<0.2%). In addition, it was found that the coadministration of the carboanhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide to diuretic therapy was very effective. We therefore conclude that an increase in proximal-tubular Na+ reabsorption is the major ("pharmacodynamic") determinant for diuretic resistance in edematous diseases with functional "underfilling" of the vascular tree. This alteration of the kidney can easily be overcome by coadministration of a carboanhydrase inhibitor (e.g., acetazolamide).

摘要

水肿性疾病的利尿治疗往往产生不充分的利钠反应(“利尿剂抵抗”)。为了研究以有效动脉血容量(EABV)降低为特征的充血性心力衰竭、肝硬化腹水和肾病综合征患者的功能变化,对不同的利尿策略进行了研究。结果表明,单用氢氯噻嗪或呋塞米治疗后利钠反应不充分。利尿剂反应与患者治疗前的钠排泄分数之间的相关性显示出明显的相互依赖性:那些滤过钠排泄分数(FENa+)远低于正常水平(<0.2%)的患者具有利尿剂抵抗。此外,还发现将碳酸酐酶抑制剂乙酰唑胺与利尿治疗联合使用非常有效。因此,我们得出结论,近端小管钠重吸收增加是血管床功能性“充盈不足”的水肿性疾病中利尿剂抵抗的主要(“药效学”)决定因素。通过联合使用碳酸酐酶抑制剂(如乙酰唑胺),肾脏的这种改变很容易被克服。

相似文献

1
Sequential nephron blockade breaks resistance to diuretics in edematous states.序贯性肾单位阻断可打破水肿状态下对利尿剂的抵抗。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997 Mar;29(3):367-72. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199703000-00010.
2
Low-dose segmental blockade of the nephron rather than high-dose diuretic monotherapy.低剂量肾单位节段性阻断而非高剂量利尿剂单一疗法。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;44 Suppl 1:S63-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01428397.
3
Edematous disorders: pathophysiology of renal sodium and water retention and treatment with diuretics.水肿性疾病:肾钠水潴留的病理生理学及利尿剂治疗
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1993 Sep;2(5):798-805.
4
Principles of diuretic therapy.利尿治疗的原则。
Dis Mon. 1998 Jun;44(6):254-68. doi: 10.1016/s0011-5029(98)90003-7.
5
Potent diuretic effects of prednisone in heart failure patients with refractory diuretic resistance.泼尼松对利尿剂抵抗难治的心力衰竭患者有强效利尿作用。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Sep;23(11):865-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70840-1.
6
Brain natriuretic peptide enhances renal actions of furosemide and suppresses furosemide-induced aldosterone activation in experimental heart failure.脑钠肽增强呋塞米的肾脏作用并抑制实验性心力衰竭中呋塞米诱导的醛固酮激活。
Circulation. 2004 Apr 6;109(13):1680-5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124064.00494.21. Epub 2004 Mar 15.
7
[Loop diuretics: facts and fallacies].[袢利尿剂:事实与谬误]
Recenti Prog Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;103(7-8):263-6. doi: 10.1701/1127.12428.
8
Acetazolamide and Hydrochlorothiazide Followed by Furosemide Versus Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide Followed by Furosemide for the Treatment of Adults With Nephrotic Edema: A Randomized Trial.乙酰唑胺和氢氯噻嗪序贯呋塞米与呋塞米和氢氯噻嗪序贯呋塞米治疗肾病性水肿成人患者的随机试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Mar;69(3):420-427. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
9
Amiloride. A potassium-sparing natriuretic agent.氨氯吡咪。一种保钾利尿钠药。
Circulation. 1968 Jan;37(1):45-53. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.37.1.45.
10
Functional state of the nephron and diuretic dose-response--rationale for low-dose combination therapy.肾单位的功能状态与利尿剂剂量反应——低剂量联合治疗的理论依据
Cardiology. 1994;84 Suppl 2:18-26. doi: 10.1159/000176453.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Metabolomics and the Discovery of Potential Serum Biomarkers for Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure.代谢组学在心力衰竭利尿剂抵抗潜在血清生物标志物发现中的应用
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 22;26(4):27001. doi: 10.31083/RCM27001. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update.老年患者心力衰竭:最新进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1982. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061982.
3
Diuretic Combination Therapy in Acute Heart Failure: An Updated Review.利尿剂联合治疗急性心力衰竭:最新综述。
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(33):2597-2605. doi: 10.2174/0113816128316596240625110337.
4
Acetazolamide therapy in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.乙酰唑胺治疗急性心力衰竭患者的系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Sep;29(5):1039-1047. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10417-7. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
5
Acetazolamide Tolerance in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: An Observational Study.急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的乙酰唑胺耐受性:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 11;13(12):3421. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123421.
6
The Changing Role of Loop Diuretics in Heart Failure Management across the Last Century.上个世纪袢利尿剂在心力衰竭管理中的角色变迁
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 14;13(6):1674. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061674.
7
Nephrotic Syndrome: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches.肾病综合征:从病理生理学到新型治疗方法
Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 3;12(3):569. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12030569.
8
Congestion in Heart Failure: From the Secret of a Mummy to Today's Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches: A Comprehensive Review.心力衰竭中的充血:从木乃伊的秘密到当今的新型诊断与治疗方法:综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):12. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010012.
9
Effect of Acetazolamide as Add-On Diuretic Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis.乙酰唑胺作为心力衰竭患者附加利尿治疗的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37792. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37792. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Pathophysiology-Based Management of Acute Heart Failure.基于病理生理学的急性心力衰竭管理
Clin Pract. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):206-218. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13010019.