Bruehl S, Carlson C R, Wilson J F, Norton J A, Colclough G, Brady M J, Sherman J J, McCubbin J A
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0044, USA.
J Behav Med. 1996 Apr;19(2):129-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01857603.
This study examined the relationship among endogenous opioids, Monitoring and Blunting coping styles, and acute pain responses. Fifty-eight male subjects underwent a 1-min pressure pain stimulus during two laboratory sessions. Subjects experienced this pain stimulus once under endogenous opioid blockade with naltrexone and once in a placebo condition. Blunting was found to be negatively correlated with pain ratings, but this relationship was significantly more prominent under opioid blockade. Results for coping behaviors subjects used to manage the experimental pain were generally consistent with the Blunting results, indicating that cognitive coping was related more strongly to decreased pain ratings and cardiovascular stress responsiveness under opioid blockade. Overall, the beneficial effects of Blunting and cognitive coping on pain responses did not depend upon endogenous opioids and, in fact, became stronger when opioid receptors were blocked. The relationship between endogenous opioids and coping appears to be dependent upon situational and stimulus characteristics.
本研究考察了内源性阿片类物质、监控与钝化应对方式以及急性疼痛反应之间的关系。58名男性受试者在两次实验室测试中接受了1分钟的压力疼痛刺激。受试者在使用纳曲酮进行内源性阿片类物质阻断的情况下经历了一次这种疼痛刺激,在安慰剂条件下也经历了一次。结果发现,钝化与疼痛评分呈负相关,但这种关系在阿片类物质阻断情况下更为显著。受试者用于应对实验性疼痛的应对行为结果总体上与钝化结果一致,表明在阿片类物质阻断情况下,认知应对与疼痛评分降低及心血管应激反应性降低的关联更为紧密。总体而言,钝化和认知应对对疼痛反应的有益影响并不依赖于内源性阿片类物质,事实上,当阿片受体被阻断时,这种影响会变得更强。内源性阿片类物质与应对之间的关系似乎取决于情境和刺激特征。