Saris W H, Binkhorst R A
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1977 Oct 31;37(3):219-28. doi: 10.1007/BF00421777.
The purpose of this study was a critical evaluation of pedometer and actometer for estimating daily physical activity. Both instruments were tested for reliability on a carriage with movements in different directions. To obtain comparable data of different pedometers it was necessary to adjust the spring tension very carefully. The reliability of the individual actometer was satisfactory, but there are large differences between the watches. Therefore, a correction factor (C.F.) was introduced. Some experiments were carried out on a treadmill. 9 Children (aged 5-6 years) and 6 young adult males (aged 21-31 years) walked and ran at different speeds. The energy expenditure was calculated from formulas. The pedometer overestimates the actual step rate with 0.1-0.3 counts per step during fast walking (6-9 km-h-1) and fast running (15 km-h-1). It underestimates the actual step rate with 0.2-0.7 counts per step, while walking slowly. It was shown that the pedometer does not reflect the differences in energy expenditure levels at different speed very well. The actometer units per step increases more or less proportional to the speed of walking and running. In contrast to the pedometer results the actometer results are more related to the energy expediture levels at different speed. The results of this study suggest that the actometer might be a valid indicator of the daily physical activity in terms of energy expenditure.
本研究的目的是对计步器和活动测量仪在估算日常身体活动方面进行批判性评估。这两种仪器都在一辆可向不同方向移动的手推车上进行了可靠性测试。为了获得不同计步器的可比数据,必须非常仔细地调整弹簧张力。单个活动测量仪的可靠性令人满意,但各手表之间存在很大差异。因此,引入了一个校正因子(C.F.)。在跑步机上进行了一些实验。9名儿童(5 - 6岁)和6名年轻成年男性(21 - 31岁)以不同速度行走和跑步。能量消耗通过公式计算得出。计步器在快走(6 - 9千米/小时)和快跑(15千米/小时)时,每步高估实际步数0.1 - 0.3步。在慢走时,每步低估实际步数0.2 - 0.7步。结果表明,计步器不能很好地反映不同速度下能量消耗水平的差异。活动测量仪每步的单位大致与行走和跑步速度成比例增加。与计步器的结果相反,活动测量仪的结果与不同速度下的能量消耗水平更相关。本研究结果表明,就能量消耗而言,活动测量仪可能是日常身体活动的一个有效指标。