Suppr超能文献

弹性回缩对下肢最大爆发力的影响。

Effects of elastic recoil on maximal explosive power of the lower limbs.

作者信息

Zamparo P, Antonutto G, Capelli C, Girardis M, Sepulcri L, di Prampero P E

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze c Tecnologie Biomediche, Università di Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):289-97. doi: 10.1007/s004210050163.

Abstract

The maximal explosive power during a two legs jump was measured on four competitive athletes [mean age 24(SD 4.3) years; height 1.79 (SD 0.09) m; body mass 68.7 (SD 12.8) kg] at different starting knee angles (70, 90, 110, 130 and 150 degrees). The experiments were performed on a newly developed instrument with which both force and speed could be measured using a force platform and a wire tachometer, respectively, and on a conventional force platform. At the smallest knee angle (70 degrees) the mean power output (W in watts per kilogram) developed during the jump was found not to differ significantly between the two methods (P > 0.1). At the larger knee angles W was 18.4% (90 degrees), 34.5% (110 degrees), 47.4% (130 degrees) and 19.4% (150 degrees) higher using the conventional force platform (P < 0.05 throughout). The difference of W between the two methods was attributed to the recovery of elastic energy due to the counter movement which immediately preceded the jump on the conventional platform, but not on the newly developed instrument. Indeed because of a mechanical arrangement which prevented the subject from moving towards the platforms, eccentric work (W-) could not be performed on the newly developed instrument; whereas W- on the conventional force platform was almost negligible at 70 degrees knee angle [mean 1.7 (SD 2.3 J)] reached a maximum of 13.1 (SD 7.9) J at 130 degrees and decreased again to a mean 4.7 (SD 3.6) J for the largest angle (150 degrees). Furthermore, on the conventional force platform, the force at the onset of the positive speed phase (Fi) was an increasing function of W- (r2 = 0.519, P < 0.001); and the difference of W between the conventional and new instruments was larger the larger the difference of Fi (r2 = 0.391, P < 0.01).

摘要

在不同起始膝关节角度(70°、90°、110°、130°和150°)下,对4名竞技运动员[平均年龄24(标准差4.3)岁;身高1.79(标准差0.09)米;体重68.7(标准差12.8)千克]的双腿跳跃最大爆发力进行了测量。实验在一种新开发的仪器上进行,该仪器分别使用力平台和线速度计来测量力和速度,同时也在传统力平台上进行。在最小膝关节角度(70°)时,发现两种方法在跳跃过程中产生的平均功率输出(每千克瓦特数)没有显著差异(P>0.1)。在较大膝关节角度时,使用传统力平台时的功率输出分别比新开发仪器高18.4%(90°)、34.5%(110°)、47.4%(130°)和19.4%(150°)(各处P<0.05)。两种方法之间功率输出的差异归因于在传统平台上跳跃前立即进行的反向动作所产生的弹性能量恢复,而新开发的仪器上没有这种情况。实际上,由于一种机械装置阻止了受试者向平台移动,新开发的仪器上无法进行离心工作(W-);而在传统力平台上,膝关节角度为70°时的离心工作几乎可以忽略不计[平均1.7(标准差2.3焦耳)],在130°时达到最大值13.1(标准差7.9)焦耳,对于最大角度(150°)又降至平均4.7(标准差3.6)焦耳。此外,在传统力平台上,正速度阶段开始时的力(Fi)是离心工作的增函数(r2 = 0.519,P<0.001);传统仪器和新仪器之间功率输出的差异随着Fi差异的增大而增大(r2 = 0.391,P<0.01)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验