Rokhlin O W, Bishop G A, Hostager B S, Waldschmidt T J, Sidorenko S P, Pavloff N, Kiefer M C, Umansky S R, Glover R A, Cohen M B
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Cancer Res. 1997 May 1;57(9):1758-68.
Of six prostatic carcinoma cell lines examined (ALVA31, DU145, JCA1, LNCaP, ND1, and PC3) by flow cytometric analysis, all were found to be positive for Fas antigen. Furthermore, of the prostate tissue specimens studied (six cases), all revealed Fas expression in benign and malignant epithelial cells. The agonistic anti-Fas monoclonal antibody (IPO-4) induced apoptosis in only two of six cell lines investigated, PC3 and ALVA31. PCR analysis indicated that all cell lines expressed normal transmembrane and death domains of Fas antigen. Using Western blot analysis, we found abundant expression of p53 in the cytoplasm of two Fas-resistant cell lines, DU145 and ND1, and did not find p53 in two Fas-sensitive cell lines, PC3 and ALVA31. Western blot and PCR analysis did not show consistent differences between cell lines examined in the expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-X(L), Bcl-X(S), and Bak. In contrast, Bax protein was not detected in two Fas-resistant cell lines, DU145 and ND1. We also showed that three Fas-resistant cell lines, DU145, ND1, and JCA1, expressed CD40, whereas the two Fas-sensitive cell lines, PC3 and ALVA31, were CD40 negative. Fas-sensitive cell lines were transfected with the cDNA encoding CD40, and the CD40-positive transfectant became more resistant to growth inhibition mediated by treatment with TNF-alpha and anti-Fas monoclonal antibody. Treatment with cycloheximide converted the phenotype of resistant cell lines from Fas resistant to Fas sensitive. Moreover, anti-Fas treatment of both resistant and sensitive cell lines induced rapid tyrosine phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of multiple proteins. These results suggest that the apoptotic machinery involved in DNA fragmentation is already in place in Fas-resistant cell lines, and thus, Fas-mediated apoptosis could be a target for therapeutic intervention.
通过流式细胞术分析检测的六种前列腺癌细胞系(ALVA31、DU145、JCA1、LNCaP、ND1和PC3),均被发现Fas抗原呈阳性。此外,在所研究的前列腺组织标本(6例)中,所有标本的良性和恶性上皮细胞均显示Fas表达。激动性抗Fas单克隆抗体(IPO-4)仅在六种研究的细胞系中的两种,即PC3和ALVA31中诱导凋亡。PCR分析表明,所有细胞系均表达正常的Fas抗原跨膜结构域和死亡结构域。使用蛋白质印迹分析,我们发现在两种Fas抗性细胞系DU145和ND1的细胞质中有大量p53表达,而在两种Fas敏感细胞系PC3和ALVA31中未发现p53。蛋白质印迹和PCR分析未显示所检测的细胞系在Bcl-2、Bcl-X(L)、Bcl-X(S)和Bak的表达上存在一致差异。相反,在两种Fas抗性细胞系DU145和ND1中未检测到Bax蛋白。我们还表明,三种Fas抗性细胞系DU145、ND1和JCA1表达CD40,而两种Fas敏感细胞系PC3和ALVA31为CD40阴性。用编码CD40的cDNA转染Fas敏感细胞系,则CD40阳性转染子对TNF-α和抗Fas单克隆抗体处理介导的生长抑制更具抗性。用放线菌酮处理可将抗性细胞系的表型从Fas抗性转变为Fas敏感型。此外,对抗性和敏感细胞系进行抗Fas处理均诱导多种蛋白质快速酪氨酸磷酸化或去磷酸化。这些结果表明,参与DNA片段化的凋亡机制在Fas抗性细胞系中已经存在,因此Fas介导的凋亡可能是治疗干预的靶点。