Uslu R, Borsellino N, Frost P, Gárban H, Ng C P, Mizutani Y, Belldegrun A, Bonavida B
Department of Microbiology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Jun;3(6):963-72.
Androgen ablation has been an effective treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, most treated patients develop hormonally resistant disease and do not respond to conventional chemotherapy. Immunotherapy against prostate cancer is an alternative approach in overcoming hormonal/drug-resistant prostate cancer. Cytotoxic immune lymphocytes kill target cells via the perforin/granzyme and the Fas-ligand (Fas-L) pathways. We hypothesize that tumor cells respond poorly to immunotherapy by developing resistance to killing by the Fas-L mechanism. This study investigated whether prostate tumor cells are sensitive to Fas-mediated killing. The human prostate carcinoma cell lines DU145, PC-3, and LnCAP were examined for their sensitivity to killing and apoptosis by the Fas-L agonist anti-Fas antibody and CTLs. All three lines moderately expressed the Fas antigen on the cell surface; however, all three lines were relatively resistant to cytotoxicity mediated by anti-Fas (CH-11) antibody. Pretreatment of DU145 and PC-3 with subtoxic concentrations of drugs followed by anti-Fas antibody resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity and apoptosis, whereas only an additive effect was obtained with LnCAP. Chemosensitization with drugs and anti-Fas was completely blocked by the addition of neutralizing anti-Fas antibody. The murine CTL hybridoma, PMMI, which kills only via the Fas-L pathway, was able to kill chemosensitized PC-3 and DU145 but not LnCAP cells. Furthermore, this cytotoxicity was blocked by anti-Fas neutralizing antibody. Chemosensitization of PC-3 and DU145 prostate tumor cells was not due to up-regulation of Fas-receptor antigen expression. Treatment of tumor cells with cisplatin did not down-regulate the antiapoptotic genes bcl-2, FAP-1, and c-myc. Further, there was no induction by cisplatin of Fas-L on the tumor cells, thus ruling out Fas/Fas-L-mediated autologous killing. These findings demonstrate that pretreatment of drug-resistant/CTL-resistant prostate DU145 and PC-3 tumor cells with subtoxic concentrations of certain chemotherapeutic drugs sensitizes the tumor cells to Fas-mediated cytotoxicity. These findings suggest that chemosensitization of tumor cells should optimize the response to immunotherapeutic interventions in the treatment of hormone-resistant/drug-resistant prostate cancer.
雄激素剥夺疗法一直是晚期前列腺癌患者的有效治疗方法。然而,大多数接受治疗的患者会发展为激素抵抗性疾病,并且对传统化疗无反应。针对前列腺癌的免疫疗法是克服激素/耐药性前列腺癌的一种替代方法。细胞毒性免疫淋巴细胞通过穿孔素/颗粒酶和Fas配体(Fas-L)途径杀死靶细胞。我们假设肿瘤细胞通过对Fas-L机制介导的杀伤产生抗性,从而对免疫疗法反应不佳。本研究调查了前列腺肿瘤细胞是否对Fas介导的杀伤敏感。检测了人前列腺癌细胞系DU145、PC-3和LnCAP对Fas-L激动剂抗Fas抗体和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)杀伤及凋亡的敏感性。所有这三种细胞系在细胞表面均适度表达Fas抗原;然而,所有这三种细胞系对抗Fas(CH-11)抗体介导的细胞毒性均具有相对抗性。用亚毒性浓度的药物预处理DU145和PC-3,然后加入抗Fas抗体,可导致协同细胞毒性和凋亡,而LnCAP仅产生相加效应。加入中和抗Fas抗体可完全阻断药物与抗Fas的化学增敏作用。仅通过Fas-L途径杀伤的小鼠CTL杂交瘤PMMI能够杀伤化学增敏的PC-3和DU145细胞,但不能杀伤LnCAP细胞。此外,这种细胞毒性被抗Fas中和抗体阻断。PC-3和DU145前列腺肿瘤细胞的化学增敏并非由于Fas受体抗原表达上调。用顺铂处理肿瘤细胞并未下调抗凋亡基因bcl-2、FAP-1和c-myc。此外,顺铂未诱导肿瘤细胞上的Fas-L表达,从而排除了Fas/Fas-L介导的自体杀伤。这些发现表明,用亚毒性浓度的某些化疗药物预处理耐药/CTL耐药的前列腺DU145和PC-3肿瘤细胞,可使肿瘤细胞对Fas介导的细胞毒性敏感。这些发现表明,肿瘤细胞的化学增敏应优化对激素抵抗/耐药性前列腺癌治疗中免疫治疗干预的反应。