Suppr超能文献

使用索卡尔指数和新评分对慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者风险特征及药物治疗对生存影响的比较分析。德国慢性粒细胞白血病研究组

Comparative analysis of the impact of risk profile and of drug therapy on survival in CML using Sokal's index and a new score. German chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)-Study Group.

作者信息

Hehlmann R, Ansari H, Hasford J, Heimpel H, Hossfeld D K, Kolb H J, Löffler H, Pralle H, Queisser W, Reiter A, Hochhaus A

机构信息

III. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 1997 Apr;97(1):76-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.102652.x.

Abstract

Survival times in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) may vary widely depending on the risk profiles of patients. This fact is frequently not, or not sufficiently, considered in evaluating survival in CML, and some studies do not report risk profiles. Therefore we analysed the relative impact of risk profile and therapy on survival using the median survival times of therapy groups and of risk groups of the three-arm randomized German CML Study I (interferon alpha v hydroxyurea v busulphan; median survival times 65 v 56 v 45 months, n = 490, median observation time 70.4 months). The impact of risk profile (Sokal) on survival as determined by the survival difference between high and low risk patients (40 months) was twice the maximum survival difference between treatment groups (20 months). A similar ratio was obtained after stratification for therapy and for risk profile. Since Sokal's index has been reported to prognostically discriminate IFN-treated patients less well than chemotherapy-treated patients, a new score with better discrimination of IFN-treated patients was also used. The results were similar for both scores. We conclude that the risk profile at diagnosis is still more important for survival of CML patients than therapy. Therefore patients should be stratified according to risk profile for comparisons of survival times between studies and treatment arms.

摘要

慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的生存时间可能因风险状况的不同而有很大差异。在评估CML患者的生存情况时,这一事实常常未被考虑或未得到充分考虑,并且一些研究没有报告风险状况。因此,我们利用德国三项治疗组和风险组的三臂随机CML研究I(干扰素α对比羟基脲对比白消安;中位生存时间分别为65个月、56个月、45个月,n = 490,中位观察时间70.4个月)的中位生存时间,分析了风险状况和治疗对生存的相对影响。高风险和低风险患者之间的生存差异(40个月)所确定的风险状况(索卡尔)对生存的影响,是治疗组之间最大生存差异(20个月)的两倍。在按治疗和风险状况分层后,得到了类似的比例。由于据报道索卡尔指数在预测干扰素治疗患者方面不如化疗治疗患者,因此还使用了一种对干扰素治疗患者有更好区分度的新评分。两种评分的结果相似。我们得出结论,对于CML患者的生存而言,诊断时的风险状况仍然比治疗更为重要。因此,在比较不同研究和治疗组的生存时间时,患者应根据风险状况进行分层。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验