• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

故意和非故意伤害的精神病理风险因素。

Psychopathologic risk factors for intentional and nonintentional injury.

作者信息

Poole G V, Lewis J L, Devidas M, Hauser C J, Martin R W, Thomae K R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):711-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00022.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199704000-00022
PMID:9137262
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Trauma has a high rate of recurrence, suggesting that some people are more injury-prone than others. This study was performed to evaluate some of the psychological and social factors that might influence the likelihood of traumatic injury.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between selected psychosocial factors and traumatic injury. At a Level I trauma center, victims of intentional trauma (excluding attempted suicide), victims of nonintentional trauma, and patients undergoing elective surgery were interviewed by a person blinded to the purposes of the study. They were given an intelligence test and underwent a structured interview, yielding psychiatric diagnostic categories established in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised (DSM-III-R).

RESULTS

Trauma patients were younger than elective surgery patients (p < 0.01) and were more likely to be men (p < 0.01). Victims of intentional injury had a higher probability of alcohol use (p < 0.01) and admitted illicit drug use (p < 0.001) than either nonintentional injury victims or elective surgery patients. Victims of intentional injury were more likely to be unemployed than those in the other two groups (p < 0.02), whereas elective surgery patients were more likely to be retired (p < 0.05) or to be disabled (p < 0.0001). The average intelligence score was slightly above the median in the nonintentional trauma group and in the control group (55th percentile and 54th percentile, respectively), compared with a mean intelligence score equivalent to the 35th percentile in the victims of intentional trauma (p < 0.001). Thirty percent of elective surgery patients met diagnostic criteria for at least one category of psychopathology, compared with 50% of nonintentional trauma patients, and 63% of intentional trauma patients (p < 0.01, trauma vs. elective surgery). Logistic regression analysis identified six variables that were independently associated with an increased tendency to be a victim of trauma: younger age, lower intelligence, antisocial personality, mental retardation, depression, and low income.

CONCLUSIONS

Victims of trauma, both nonintentional, and especially intentional, have a high incidence of psychopathology. Victims of intentional trauma have significantly lower intelligence scores than either nonintentional injury or elective surgery patients. The high incidence of unemployment, alcohol abuse, and illicit drug use in victims of intentional injury might provide several opportunities for trauma prevention programs. Underlying psychological disorders will have to be addressed to reduce the likelihood of becoming a victim of trauma.

摘要

目的

创伤的复发率很高,这表明有些人比其他人更容易受伤。本研究旨在评估一些可能影响创伤性损伤可能性的心理和社会因素。

方法

进行了一项病例对照研究,以评估所选心理社会因素与创伤性损伤之间的关系。在一家一级创伤中心,由对研究目的不知情的人员对故意创伤受害者(不包括自杀未遂者)、非故意创伤受害者和接受择期手术的患者进行访谈。他们接受了智力测试并进行了结构化访谈,得出了《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中确立的精神科诊断类别。

结果

创伤患者比择期手术患者年轻(p < 0.01),且男性比例更高(p < 0.01)。故意受伤的受害者饮酒概率更高(p < 0.01),承认使用非法药物的比例也高于非故意受伤受害者或择期手术患者(p < 0.001)。故意受伤的受害者比其他两组更可能失业(p < 0.02),而择期手术患者更可能退休(p < 0.05)或残疾(p < 0.0001)。非故意创伤组和对照组的平均智力得分略高于中位数(分别为第55百分位数和第54百分位数),而故意创伤受害者的平均智力得分相当于第35百分位数(p < 0.001)。30%的择期手术患者符合至少一种精神病理学类别的诊断标准,相比之下,非故意创伤患者为50%,故意创伤患者为63%(p < 0.01,创伤组与择期手术组)。逻辑回归分析确定了六个与创伤受害者倾向增加独立相关的变量:年龄较小、智力较低、反社会人格、智力迟钝、抑郁和低收入。

结论

创伤受害者,无论是非故意的,尤其是故意的,精神病理学发病率都很高。故意创伤受害者的智力得分明显低于非故意受伤或择期手术患者。故意受伤受害者中高失业率、酗酒和使用非法药物的情况可能为创伤预防项目提供几个机会。必须解决潜在的心理障碍,以降低成为创伤受害者的可能性。

相似文献

1
Psychopathologic risk factors for intentional and nonintentional injury.故意和非故意伤害的精神病理风险因素。
J Trauma. 1997 Apr;42(4):711-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199704000-00022.
2
Trauma is a recurrent disease.
Surgery. 1993 Jun;113(6):608-11.
3
Intracity regional demographics of major trauma.城市内主要创伤的区域人口统计学
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jun;25(6):788-93. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70209-1.
4
Clinical and psychiatric characteristics of self-inflicted burn patients in the United States: comparison with a nonintentional burn group.美国自残烧伤患者的临床和精神特征:与非故意烧伤组的比较。
J Burn Care Res. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):381-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000100.
5
Psychoactive substance use disorders among seriously injured trauma center patients.严重创伤中心患者的精神活性物质使用障碍
JAMA. 1997 Jun 11;277(22):1769-74.
6
Intentional burns in Nepal: a comparative study.尼泊尔的故意烧伤:一项对比研究。
Burns. 2015 Sep;41(6):1306-14. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
7
Prior trauma and psychiatric history as risk factors for intentional and unintentional injury in Australia.澳大利亚既往创伤史和精神病史作为故意和意外伤害的风险因素。
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):470-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815d965e.
8
The two faces of intentional self-inflicted injury: High in-hospital mortality, low postdischarge mortality, but high readmission rates.故意自伤的两面性:住院期间死亡率高,出院后死亡率低,但再入院率高。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):580-586. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
9
Risk factors of adolescent and young adult trauma victims.青少年及青年创伤受害者的风险因素。
Am J Crit Care. 1995 Sep;4(5):370-8.
10
Alcohol and illicit drugs in traumatic deaths: prevalence and association with type and severity of injuries.创伤性死亡中的酒精与非法药物:患病率及其与损伤类型和严重程度的关联。
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Nov;199(5):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.07.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Distress of Patients Experiencing Different Types of Road Traffic Injuries in Vietnam.越南不同类型道路交通伤害患者的心理痛苦。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 14;17(10):3429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103429.
2
Comparison of Intentional and Unintentional Injuries Among Chinese Children and Adolescents.比较中国儿童和青少年的故意伤害和意外伤害。
J Epidemiol. 2020 Dec 5;30(12):529-536. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190152. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
3
Burn recidivism: a 10-year retrospective study characterizing patients with repeated burn injuries at a large tertiary referral burn center in the United States.
烧伤复发:一项为期10年的回顾性研究,对美国一家大型三级转诊烧伤中心的反复烧伤患者进行特征分析。
Burns Trauma. 2019 Mar 19;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0145-4. eCollection 2019.
4
Psychological Prophylaxis: An Integrated Psychological Services Program in Trauma Care.心理预防:创伤护理中的综合心理服务项目。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019 Sep;26(3):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s10880-018-9586-3.
5
Prevalence and predictors of mental disorders in intentionally and unintentionally injured emergency center patients.急诊中心故意和非故意受伤患者精神障碍的患病率及预测因素
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Sep;202(9):638-46. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000176.
6
A cross-sectional study of psychological complaints and quality of life in severely injured patients.严重创伤患者心理问题与生活质量的横断面研究。
Qual Life Res. 2014 May;23(4):1353-62. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0546-y. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
7
Higher psychological distress is associated with unintentional injuries in US adults.在美国成年人中,较高的心理困扰与意外伤害有关。
Inj Prev. 2014 Aug;20(4):258-65. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040958. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
8
Relationships between depressive symptoms and self-reported unintentional injuries: the cross-sectional population-based FIN-D2D survey.抑郁症状与自我报告的非故意伤害之间的关系:基于人群的芬兰 FIN-D2D 横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 10;12:516. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-516.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging after most common form of concussion.最常见形式脑震荡后的磁共振成像。
BMC Med Imaging. 2009 Jun 17;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-9-11.
10
Adult correlates of early behavioral maladjustment: a study of injured drivers.早期行为失调的成人相关因素:一项对受伤驾驶员的研究。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:39-48.