文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.

作者信息

Hristova L, Hakama M

机构信息

Finnish Cancer Registry, University of Tampere School of Public Health.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.


DOI:
PMID:9143316
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries. There is sufficient scientific evidence to conclude that screening for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer will result in a reduction in mortality. The effects on mortality were predicted for the future up to the year 2017 assuming that the Nordic countries are covered by screening as a nation-wide population-based public health policy and comparing the predicted mortality trends with those assuming no screening programmes. For cervical cancer the programme as practised in Finland was used as a point of reference. For breast cancer and for colorectal cancer the results of randomized preventive trials were assumed in the absence of detailed results based on any public health policy, i.e., a reduction of 30% in mortality from breast cancer and 20% in mortality from colorectal cancer. The assumed ages and frequencies of screening ranged from 25 to 59 years at 5-year intervals for cervical cancer, from 50 to 69 at 2-year intervals for breast cancer and annual screening from 50 to 74 years for colorectal cancer. Data on incidence and incidence predicted up to the year 2012, mortality, survival and size of the general population were employed in the estimation. Age-cohort and age-period-cohort log-linear models were applied in predicting future mortality rates with and without screening. The choice of the models depended on the age distribution of deaths from each particular site of cancer, on changes in public health policy, such as establishment of mass-screening, and on the goodness of fit of the model. The screening policy assumed would result in 1600 annual deaths prevented out of the potential 13,600 deaths in the Nordic countries in 1995, corresponding to 11% of the deaths from the three primary sites. Only after the year 2010 will the ultimate effect of such a screening policy have as full an effect and in 2013-2017 the annual number of cancer deaths prevented will be 3900 out of 15,000 potential deaths, i.e., a 26% reduction. This is equal to 5.7% of all cancer deaths in the Nordic countries in 2013-2017 (2.0% for males and 9.7% for females). The predicted numbers of annual deaths prevented in 2013-2017 are 1500 for cervical cancer, 1000 for breast cancer and 1500 for colorectal cancer. Most (91%) of the cervical cancers can be prevented, whereas the proportion of breast cancer deaths (18%) and colorectal cancer deaths (18%) prevented will be much smaller. Costs of the screening programmes were estimated taking into consideration the direct costs of screening and savings from advanced disease treatment and terminal care. The total cost of screening for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer in the Nordic countries in the year 2010 is estimated to be $111 m. Cervical cancer screening is estimated to save $17 m yearly in the period 2008-2012. Screening for cervical cancer is approaching a phase when both the effect and costs are relatively stable and it was estimated to be cost-saving. The effect of screening for breast and colorectal cancers is expected to become apparent gradually during the predicted period due to the increasing number (and percentage) of patients diagnosed by screening. When the screening programmes are assumed to achieve the optimal effect, the reduction in mortality will increase and treatment costs fall, resulting in a substantial decrease in the cost-effectiveness ratio. In the last considered period (2008-2012) the costs per life year gained (breast cancer $15,400, colorectal cancer $5700) are approximately one half of those at the onset of screening. The differences in the costs per LYG were relatively small between the Nordic countries and mainly dependent on the differences in baseline risk of cancer. The total cost of the three screening programmes was estimated at $4400 per life years gained in the year 2010.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.

Acta Oncol. 1997

[2]
Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008-9-17

[3]
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.

Oncologist. 1996

[4]
Screening for colorectal cancer.

Acta Oncol. 2005

[5]
Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006.

Acta Oncol. 2010-6

[6]
Potential contribution of screening to cancer mortality reduction.

Cancer Detect Prev. 1993

[7]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.

Lung Cancer. 2005-5

[8]
The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995.

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999-7

[9]
Trends in the overall survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1964-2003 in the Nordic countries followed up to the end of 2006: the importance of case-mix.

Acta Oncol. 2010-6

[10]
The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.

Eur J Health Econ. 2009-5-17

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening at age 65 - A register-based cohort study.

PLoS One. 2019-3-26

[2]
50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence.

Br J Cancer. 2014-7-3

[3]
Assessing the real-world cost-effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER-2/neu positive breast cancer.

Oncologist. 2012-2-2

[4]
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Epidemiol Rev. 2011-6-1

[5]
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.

Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010-8

[6]
Breast cancer mortality with varying invitational policies in organised mammography.

Br J Cancer. 2008-2-12

[7]
Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007-1-23

[8]
Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial.

BMC Public Health. 2006-10-16

[9]
Estimating the cost of cervical cancer screening in five developing countries.

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006-8-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索