Leibovici L, Paul M, Poznanski O, Drucker M, Samra Z, Konigsberger H, Pitlik S D
Department of Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tiqva, Israel.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 May;41(5):1127-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.5.1127.
The aim of the present study was to test whether the combination of a beta-lactam drug plus an aminoglycoside has advantage over monotherapy for severe gram-negative infections. Of 2,124 patients with gram-negative bacteremia surveyed prospectively, 670 were given inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment and the mortality rate in this group was 34%, whereas the mortality rate was 18% for 1,454 patients given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (P = 0.0001). The mortality rates for patients given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment were 17% for 789 patients given a single beta-lactam drug, 19% for 327 patients given combination treatment, 24% for 249 patients given a single aminoglycoside, and 29% for 89 patients given other antibiotics (P = 0.0001). When patients were stratified according to risk factors for mortality other than antibiotic treatment, combination therapy showed no advantage over treatment with a single beta-lactam drug except for neutropenic patients (odds ratio [OR] for mortality, 0.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.2 to 1.3) and patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.8). On multivariable logistic regression analysis including all risk factors for mortality, combination therapy had no advantage over therapy with a single beta-lactam drug. The mortality rate for patients treated with a single appropriate aminoglycoside was higher than that for patients given a beta-lactam drug in all strata except for patients with urinary tract infections. When the results of blood cultures were known, 1,878 patients were available for follow-up. Of these, 816 patients were given a single beta-lactam drug, 442 were given combination treatment, and 193 were given a single aminoglycoside. The mortality rates were 13, 15, and 23%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Both on stratified and on multivariable logistic regression analyses, combination treatment showed a benefit over treatment with a single beta-lactam drug only for neutropenic patients (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.7). In summary, combination treatment showed no advantage over treatment with an appropriate beta-lactam drug in nonneutropenic patients with gram-negative bacteremia.
本研究的目的是测试β-内酰胺类药物联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗重症革兰阴性菌感染是否比单一疗法更具优势。在对2124例革兰阴性菌血症患者进行前瞻性调查中,670例患者接受了不恰当的经验性抗生素治疗,该组死亡率为34%,而1454例接受恰当经验性抗生素治疗的患者死亡率为18%(P = 0.0001)。接受恰当经验性抗生素治疗的患者中,789例接受单一β-内酰胺类药物治疗的死亡率为17%,327例接受联合治疗的死亡率为19%,249例接受单一氨基糖苷类药物治疗的死亡率为24%,89例接受其他抗生素治疗的死亡率为29%(P = 0.0001)。当根据除抗生素治疗外的死亡风险因素对患者进行分层时,除中性粒细胞减少患者(死亡比值比[OR]为0.5;95%置信区间[95%CI]为0.2至1.3)和铜绿假单胞菌血症患者(OR为0.7;95%CI为0.3至1.8)外,联合治疗与单一β-内酰胺类药物治疗相比无优势。在纳入所有死亡风险因素的多变量逻辑回归分析中,联合治疗与单一β-内酰胺类药物治疗相比无优势。除尿路感染患者外,在所有分层中,接受单一恰当氨基糖苷类药物治疗的患者死亡率高于接受β-内酰胺类药物治疗的患者。当血培养结果已知时,1878例患者可供随访。其中,816例患者接受单一β-内酰胺类药物治疗,442例患者接受联合治疗,193例患者接受单一氨基糖苷类药物治疗。死亡率分别为13%、15%和23%(P = 0.0001)。在分层分析和多变量逻辑回归分析中,联合治疗仅对中性粒细胞减少患者显示出优于单一β-内酰胺类药物治疗的益处(OR为0.2;95%CI为0.05至0.7)。总之,在非中性粒细胞减少的革兰阴性菌血症患者中,联合治疗与恰当的β-内酰胺类药物治疗相比无优势。