Piccart M, Klastersky J, Meunier F, Lagast H, Van Laethem Y, Weerts D
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Dec;26(6):870-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.6.870.
Empirical therapy with cefoperazone was compared with cefoperazone plus amikacin in granulocytopenic and nongranulocytopenic febrile patients. In nonneutropenic patients the overall response rate to cefoperazone was 88%; 10 of 12 gram-negative bacteremic patients were cured. Cefoperazone plus amikacin resulted in an 88% overall response rate and cured 14 of 15 patients with bacteremia. In neutropenic patients the overall response rate was 77% with cefoperazone alone and 73% with cefoperazone plus amikacin; the cure rates for gram-negative bacteremias were 8 of 11 and 6 of 12 patients, respectively. Our findings support the concept of single-drug empirical therapy with cefoperazone in febrile cancer patients, whether granulocytopenic or not, especially when gram-negative bacteremias are predominantly caused by Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species. The issue of Pseudomonas spp. and other more resistant pathogens needs further assessment with a larger number of patients.
在粒细胞减少和非粒细胞减少的发热患者中,将头孢哌酮的经验性治疗与头孢哌酮加阿米卡星的治疗进行了比较。在非中性粒细胞减少患者中,头孢哌酮的总体有效率为88%;12例革兰阴性菌血症患者中有10例治愈。头孢哌酮加阿米卡星的总体有效率为88%,15例菌血症患者中有14例治愈。在中性粒细胞减少患者中,单独使用头孢哌酮的总体有效率为77%,头孢哌酮加阿米卡星的总体有效率为73%;革兰阴性菌血症的治愈率分别为11例中的8例和12例中的6例。我们的研究结果支持在发热的癌症患者中,无论是否存在粒细胞减少,尤其是当革兰阴性菌血症主要由大肠杆菌或克雷伯菌属引起时,使用头孢哌酮进行单药经验性治疗的理念。对于铜绿假单胞菌和其他更具耐药性的病原体问题,需要通过更多患者进行进一步评估。