相似文献
1
Women's autonomy in childbirth.
BMJ. 1997 Apr 19;314(7088):1143-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1143.
2
Caesarean section: a treatment for mental disorder? Tameside & Glossop Acute Services Unit v CH (a patient) [1996] 1 FLR 762.
BMJ. 1997 Apr 19;314(7088):1183-4; discussion 1184-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1183.
3
Treatment without consent (pregnancy): adult -- Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v. C.H.
Med Law Rev. 1996 Summer;4(2):193-8. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/4.2.193.
4
Caesareans under duress.
Health Care Anal. 1997 Jun;5(2):160-3.
5
Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Harv Womens Law J. 1987 Spring;10:9-58.
6
Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
McGill Law J. 1995 Aug;40(4):947-91.
7
Cesareans and Samaritans.
Law Med Health Care. 1987 Fall;15(3):118-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1987.tb01014.x.
8
Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
Houst Law Rev. 1992 Spring;29(1):185-218.
9
Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
Can J Women Law. 1990;4(1):265-75.
10
Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law.
Med Law Int. 2002;5(4):239-58. doi: 10.1177/096853320200500401.
引用本文的文献
1
Women's and Provider's Moral Reasoning About the Permissibility of Coercion in Birth: A Descriptive Ethics Study.
Health Care Anal. 2024 Sep;32(3):184-204. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00480-4. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
The new imperative to test for HIV in pregnancy.
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Apr;48(429):1127-8.
Zotero 插件