Performance of a fully automated in vitro allergy testing system.

BACKGROUND

Since the development of the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for quantification of allergen-specific IgE, numerous non-radoisotopic methods have been devised which combine the proven cellulose disc technology with enzyme-linked immunoassay methods. The HY.TEC EIA (Hycor Biomedical, Inc. Irvine, CA) was compared with Pharmacia CAP with respect to overall system features and assay performance characteristics.

METHODS

The HY.TEC EIA and Pharmacia CAP were compared with respect to calibrator range, sensitivity, type of detection, type of solid phase, throughput, and mode of operation. To determine the assay sensitivity and specificity for a variety of allergens, a total of 2,447 tests were performed on both CAP and HY.TEC EIA. The samples were scored positive in both cases using a cutoff of 0.35 IU/mL.

RESULTS

The general features of the HY.TEC EIA system are comparable to Pharmacia UniCAP, with the added advantage of higher throughput. Intra-assay precision was 7% and inter-assay precision was 9-15%. Using CAP as a comparative method, HY.TEC EIA has a sensitivity of 94.0% and a specificity of 94.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HY.TEC EIA demonstrates excellent agreement with the Pharmacia CAP system in the determination of allergen-specific IgE. With the automation necessary in today's clinical laboratory, we conclude that the HY.TEC EIA is a state-of-the-art tool for the diagnosis of allergic disease.