Suppr超能文献

肾病综合征和肝硬化时肾脏对钠和水排泄的调节

Regulation of renal sodium and water excretion in the nephrotic syndrome and cirrhosis of the liver.

作者信息

Jespersen B

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Medicine, Aarhus Kommunehospital.

出版信息

Dan Med Bull. 1997 Apr;44(2):191-207.

PMID:9151012
Abstract

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) produced in the heart and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesised in the kidneys facilitate renal excretion of sodium and water, and thus oppose the actions of angiotensin II, aldosterone, arginine vasopressin (AVP), endothelin, and the renal sympathetic nerves. In the present work we studied the contributions and interactions of these substances in the regulation of blood volume (BV), renal haemodynamics, renal sodium and water handling and blood pressure (BP) in patients with glomerulonephritis and cirrhosis. The aim was through a better understanding of the pathophysiology to improve the treatment of fluid retention in these patients, which occurs as development of the nephrotic syndrome and accumulation of ascites, respectively. Normotensive patients with glomerulonephritis but without the nephrotic syndrome had normal baseline BV values measured as the sum of plasma volume and red cell volume; they responded to BV expansion after infusion of albumin and BV depletion after administration of furosemide with appropriate counterregulatory hormonal changes. However, they tended to hold more fluid within the intravascular phase after both manipulations than did the healthy subjects. The acutely induced increase in BV did not affect the BP, which was likely attributable to the changes in plasma values of angiotensin II and ANP shown. ANP could be expected to be a tool in the management of fluid accumulation in patients with the nephrotic syndrome and cirrhosis. The non-renal effects of high-dose ANP were studied for the first time in dialysis patients without excretory kidney function. A reversible shift of fluid away from the intravascular phase was demonstrated. The BV was maximally reduced 30 min after ANP had been given. The BP was reduced before fluid displacement occurred and to the same extent in patients and healthy subjects. The reduction in the BV was negatively correlated to the reduction in BP. From that study it is inferred that the BP reducing effect of ANP is not mediated by its diuretic effect or ability to displace fluid from the intravascular to the interstitial fluid compartment. As a pharmacological dose of ANP was given, it can only be suggested that endogenous ANP, by altering transcapillary Starling mechanisms, assists in buffering intravascular fluid expansion until renal excretion or dialysis can take place. The same dose of ANP was given to patients with the nephrotic syndrome and cirrhosis. The ability of ANP to increase sodium excretion through inhibition of sodium reabsorption in the distal tubules and to increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was blunted in both patient groups, but the BP was reduced to the same extent as in the healthy controls. Patients with the nephrotic syndrome tended to have a slightly elevated BP. We only studied patients with normal or slightly reduced GFR. They had a normal BV, reduced renal filtration fraction, suppressed aldosterone, increased ANP, but normal plasma values of angiotensin II, endothelin, and AVP, and normal urinary excretion of PGE2. Thus, neither haemodynamic nor hormonal factors can easily explain the spontaneous sodium retention or the resistance to the effects of ANP and furosemide. An interesting finding, not previously reported in nephrotic humans, was the low cyclic guanosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cGMP) in plasma and urine in relation to ANP, both before and after administration of ANP. It is hypothesised that renal resistance to ANP, exaggerated renal cGMP degradation, or preponderance of clearance receptors in nephrotic kidneys may contribute to sodium retention and the low filtration fraction. Elevation of ANP in these patients is connected with increased albuminuria, and probably an increase in intraglomerular capillary pressure. The resistance to furosemide could not be attributed to delayed passage of fluid from the interstitial to the intravascular fluid phase, but is most likely due to renal tubular resistan

摘要

心脏产生的心房利钠肽(ANP)和肾脏合成的前列腺素E2(PGE2)促进肾脏对钠和水的排泄,从而对抗血管紧张素II、醛固酮、精氨酸加压素(AVP)、内皮素和肾交感神经的作用。在本研究中,我们探讨了这些物质在调节肾小球肾炎和肝硬化患者血容量(BV)、肾脏血流动力学、肾脏钠和水代谢以及血压(BP)方面的作用及相互关系。目的是通过更好地理解病理生理学来改善这些患者的液体潴留治疗,液体潴留分别表现为肾病综合征的发展和腹水的积聚。血压正常但无肾病综合征的肾小球肾炎患者,其以血浆容量与红细胞容量之和衡量的基线BV值正常;输注白蛋白后BV增加以及给予呋塞米后BV减少时,他们会出现相应的反调节激素变化。然而,与健康受试者相比,在这两种操作后他们倾向于在血管内阶段保留更多液体。急性诱导的BV增加未影响血压,这可能归因于所示的血管紧张素II和ANP血浆值的变化。ANP有望成为治疗肾病综合征和肝硬化患者液体潴留的一种手段。首次在无排泄功能的透析患者中研究了高剂量ANP的非肾脏效应。结果表明液体从血管内阶段发生可逆性转移。给予ANP后30分钟BV降至最大程度。在液体移位发生前血压降低,患者和健康受试者降低程度相同。BV的降低与血压的降低呈负相关。从该研究推断,ANP的降压作用不是由其利尿作用或使液体从血管内转移至组织间隙的能力介导的。由于给予的是药理剂量的ANP,只能推测内源性ANP通过改变跨毛细血管的Starling机制,有助于缓冲血管内液体扩张,直到肾脏排泄或进行透析。将相同剂量的ANP给予肾病综合征和肝硬化患者。在这两组患者中,ANP通过抑制远端肾小管钠重吸收来增加钠排泄以及增加肾小球滤过率(GFR)的能力均减弱,但血压降低程度与健康对照组相同。肾病综合征患者的血压往往略有升高。我们仅研究了GFR正常或略有降低的患者。他们的BV正常,肾脏滤过分数降低,醛固酮受抑制,ANP增加,但血管紧张素II、内皮素和AVP的血浆值正常,PGE2的尿排泄正常。因此,无论是血流动力学因素还是激素因素都难以解释自发性钠潴留或对ANP和呋塞米作用的抵抗。一个有趣的发现是,在肾病患者中以前未报道过,在给予ANP前后,血浆和尿液中与ANP相关的环磷酸鸟苷(cGMP)均较低。据推测,肾脏对ANP的抵抗、肾脏cGMP降解过度或肾病肾脏中清除受体占优势可能导致钠潴留和滤过分数降低。这些患者中ANP升高与蛋白尿增加有关,可能还与肾小球内毛细血管压力升高有关。对呋塞米的抵抗不能归因于液体从组织间隙向血管内阶段的延迟转移,最可能是由于肾小管抵抗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验