• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿头皮裂伤皮肤缝合器械与标准缝线的比较:一项关于成本和时间效益的随机研究

Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits.

作者信息

Kanegaye J T, Vance C W, Chan L, Schonfeld N

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1997 May;130(5):808-13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80025-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80025-x
PMID:9152292
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the total costs and the physician time requirements for suture and staple repair of pediatric scalp lacerations.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-eight children, 13 months to 16 years of age, coming to a children's hospital emergency department with simple scalp lacerations were prospectively randomly selected to receive staple or suture repair. Wound lengths, times required for initial wound care and closure, and equipment use were recorded. Patients returned in 1 week for suture or staple removal and wound reevaluation. The two methods were compared in terms of both time expended and costs of equipment and physician compensation.

RESULTS

Forty-five children underwent staple repair and 43 underwent suture repair. There were no differences in age, sex, wound length, number of sutures or staples per centimeter, or physician experience. Stapling resulted in shorter wound closure times (65 vs 397 seconds; p < 0.0001) and shorter overall times for wound care and closure (395 vs 752 seconds; p < 0.0001). Staple repair was less expensive in terms of equipment ($12.55 vs $17.59; p < 0.0001) and total cost based on equipment and physician time ($23.55 vs $38.51; p < 0.0001). The follow-up rate was 91%, with no cosmetic or infectious complications in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapling is faster and less expensive than suturing in the repair of uncomplicated pediatric scalp lacerations, with no additional complications. Physicians who treat children with scalp lacerations should consider the use of stapling devices.

摘要

目的

比较小儿头皮裂伤缝合与吻合器修复的总成本及医生所需时间。

研究设计

前瞻性随机选取88名年龄在13个月至16岁、因单纯头皮裂伤前往儿童医院急诊科的儿童,接受吻合器或缝合修复。记录伤口长度、初始伤口处理及缝合所需时间以及设备使用情况。患者在1周后返回进行缝线或吻合器拆除及伤口重新评估。从时间消耗、设备成本及医生报酬方面对两种方法进行比较。

结果

45名儿童接受吻合器修复,43名接受缝合修复。在年龄、性别、伤口长度、每厘米缝线或吻合器数量或医生经验方面无差异。吻合器修复导致伤口缝合时间更短(65秒对397秒;p<0.0001),伤口处理及缝合的总时间更短(395秒对752秒;p<0.0001)。吻合器修复在设备方面成本更低(12.55美元对17.59美元;p<0.0001),基于设备和医生时间的总成本也更低(23.55美元对38.51美元;p<0.0001)。随访率为91%,两组均无美容或感染并发症。

结论

在修复小儿单纯头皮裂伤时,吻合器修复比缝合更快且成本更低,无额外并发症。治疗小儿头皮裂伤的医生应考虑使用吻合器。

相似文献

1
Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits.小儿头皮裂伤皮肤缝合器械与标准缝线的比较:一项关于成本和时间效益的随机研究
J Pediatr. 1997 May;130(5):808-13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)80025-x.
2
Cosmetic outcome of scalp wound closure with staples in the pediatric emergency department: a prospective, randomized trial.小儿急诊科头皮伤口用吻合钉闭合的美容效果:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Jun;18(3):171-3. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200206000-00005.
3
Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure.皮肤缝合中吻合器缝合与传统缝合的成本分析
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Jan;13(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90248-1.
4
Evaluation of skin stapling for wound closure in the emergency department.急诊科伤口缝合皮肤吻合器的评估
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Oct;18(10):1122-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80945-x.
5
Efficacy of nurses suturing pediatric dermal lacerations in an emergency department.护士在急诊科缝合小儿皮肤裂伤的疗效
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Dec;24(6):1144-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70245-4.
6
A randomized controlled trial comparing the hair apposition technique with tissue glue to standard suturing in scalp lacerations (HAT study).一项比较头皮裂伤中毛发对合技术与组织胶水与标准缝合的随机对照试验(毛发对合技术研究)。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;40(1):19-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.125928.
7
Modified hair apposition technique as the primary closure method for scalp lacerations.改良毛发对位缝合技术作为头皮裂伤的主要缝合方法。
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;27(9):1050-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.08.001.
8
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
9
Scalp Staples Placed in a Pediatric Emergency Department: Feasibility and Benefits of Home Removal.小儿急诊科头皮钉的应用:居家拆除的可行性及益处
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Mar 1;38(3):e1143-e1146. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002213.
10
A prospective study of two methods of closing surgical scalp wounds.两种闭合手术头皮伤口方法的前瞻性研究。
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Feb;26(1):75-7. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.601946. Epub 2011 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of Use of Reusable Skin Staples and Vertical Mattress Sutures in the Closure of Midline Laparotomy Wounds.可重复使用皮肤吻合钉与垂直褥式缝合用于中线剖腹手术伤口闭合的比较研究
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_50_23. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic port site skin closure techniques (CLOSA): transcutaneous suturing versus subcuticular sutures versus adhesive strips: a prospective single-blinded randomized control trial.腹腔镜切口皮肤缝合技术(CLOSA)的比较:经皮缝合与皮下缝合与胶带的比较:一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 8;408(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02950-0.
3
Staples versus sutures for skin closure in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
髋关节置换术中皮肤缝合的缝线与订书钉比较:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 24;16(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02870-z.
4
Practice of wound closure techniques among emergency physicians and surgeons in Makkah City Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯麦加市医院急诊科医生和外科医生伤口闭合技术的实践情况。
J Public Health Res. 2021 Apr 13;10(3):2168. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2168.
5
Staples Versus Sutures for Skin Closure in Standard Four Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.标准四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中皮肤缝合用吻合钉与缝线的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
Cureus. 2021 Mar 6;13(3):e13725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13725.
6
Complication rate of different wound closures after primary hip arthroplasty - A survey of 373 patients.初次髋关节置换术后不同伤口闭合方式的并发症发生率——对373例患者的调查
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2017 Dec 7;11:15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2017.11.002. eCollection 2018 Jan.
7
Comparison between stainless steel staples and silk sutures for primary closure of skin in patients undergoing neck dissection: A comparative clinical study.颈部清扫术患者皮肤一期缝合中不锈钢吻合钉与丝线缝合的比较:一项对比临床研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S51-5. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152938.
8
A retrospective observational study comparing hair apposition technique, suturing and stapling for scalp lacerations.一项比较毛发对位技术、缝合和订书钉用于头皮裂伤的回顾性观察研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Jul 25;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-27. eCollection 2013.
9
Staples equal sutures for skin closure after soft tissue tumor resection.皮内缝合与缝线缝合在软组织肿瘤切除术后皮缘关闭中的效果相当。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):899-904. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2524-z.
10
Modality of wound closure after total knee replacement: are staples as safe as sutures? A retrospective study of 181 patients.全膝关节置换术后伤口闭合方式:吻合钉与缝线一样安全吗?一项对181例患者的回顾性研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 Oct 19;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-26.