• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗中的责任问题。

Liability issues in managed care.

作者信息

Ellis M S

机构信息

Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery at LSU School of Medicine in New Orleans, USA.

出版信息

J La State Med Soc. 1997 May;149(5):151-8.

PMID:9154751
Abstract

The explosive growth in Managed Care Organizations as a mechanism for providing health care in the United States has generated an equal explosion in litigation and new legislation related to problems within this delivery system. Abuses have included the "gagging" of physicians from providing full disclosure of medical options for their patients, inappropriate denial of care, denial of specialty referral, false claims data, insurer insolvency, economic credentialling, deselection, financial disincentives to render care, and lack of appeal or grievance mechanisms. These issues and others have resulted in injuries to patients and damage to the patient/physician relationship. This article discusses some of the more dramatic litigated cases and endeavors to alert both physicians and patients to potential legal matters that should be considered before becoming involved within this structure.

摘要

作为美国提供医疗保健的一种机制,管理式医疗组织的迅猛发展引发了与之相关的诉讼和新立法的激增,这些诉讼和立法涉及该医疗服务体系内部的问题。滥用行为包括限制医生向患者充分披露医疗选择、不当拒绝治疗、拒绝专科转诊、虚假索赔数据、保险公司破产、经济资格审查、取消选定资格、提供医疗服务的经济激励不足以及缺乏上诉或申诉机制。这些问题以及其他问题已导致患者受到伤害,并损害了患者与医生之间的关系。本文讨论了一些较为引人注目的诉讼案件,并努力提醒医生和患者注意在参与这一体系之前应考虑的潜在法律问题。

相似文献

1
Liability issues in managed care.管理式医疗中的责任问题。
J La State Med Soc. 1997 May;149(5):151-8.
2
Managing the utilization of managed care (health care reform II).
Manag Care Q. 1998 Autumn;6(4):47-51.
3
Wielding the wand without facing the music: allowing utilization review physicians to trump doctors' orders, but protecting them from legal risk ordinarily attached to the medical degree.挥舞着魔杖却不承担责任:允许利用审查医生推翻医生的医嘱,但保护他们免受通常与医学学位相关的法律风险。
Duke Law J. 2010 Feb;59(5):955-1000.
4
Legal liability, denial of benefits and managed care.法律责任、福利拒付与管理式医疗
Mich Health Hosp. 1999 Sep-Oct;35(5):30-1.
5
Managed care liability.管理式医疗责任
Physician Exec. 1999 Mar-Apr;25(2):77-9.
6
The circuitous journey to the Patients' Bill of Rights: winners and losers.
Albany Law Rev. 2000;65(1):17-95.
7
Supreme Court may be managed care's new best friend.
N Y State Dent J. 2000 Nov;66(9):6-8.
8
Avoiding managed care's liability risks.
J Med Assoc Ga. 1994 Aug;83(8):465-6, 484.
9
ERISA preemption and regulation of managed health care: the case for managed federalism.《雇员退休收入保障法》的优先适用与管理式医疗保健监管:管理型联邦制的案例
Am J Law Med. 1997;23(2-3):251-89.
10
Physician liability and managed care: a philosophical perspective.
Ga State Univ Law Rev. 2003 Spring;19(3):641-703.