Zern D S, Kenney H J, Kvaraceus W C
J Genet Psychol. 1977 Sep;131(1st Half):107-13. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1977.10533279.
Thirty-two emotionally disturbed and 23 normal adolescents were given two test of cognitive style developed by Kagan (Matching Familiar Figures and the Haptic-Visual Tests). The results were analyzed to evaluate two major hypotheses: (a) that emotionally disturbed adolescents perform differently on the tests than normal adolescents; and (b) that members of both groups reveal a high degree of stability among various subtest scores, both within the same test and across different tests. In testing the first hypothesis, the authors discovered minimal differences in mean scores for the different samples on each of the five subtests involved. However, a more complex analysis was carried out on the basis of the assumption that extreme scores on the various items were a more meaningful indicator of performance than simple means. This analysis yielded the conclusion that these emotionally disturbed adolescents were more impulsive (i.e., answered more quickly and made more errors) than their counterparts in public schools. An analysis of the intercorrelations between different tests and within tests in testing the second hypothesis revealed 19 out of 40 significant correlations, with an additional 14 out of the remaining 21 in the predicted direction. Finally, nine out of the 10 correlations combining the subgroups were statistically significant.
32名情绪困扰青少年和23名正常青少年接受了由卡根开发的两项认知风格测试(匹配熟悉图形测试和触觉 - 视觉测试)。对结果进行了分析,以评估两个主要假设:(a)情绪困扰青少年在测试中的表现与正常青少年不同;(b)两组成员在同一测试内以及不同测试之间的各个子测试分数中都表现出高度的稳定性。在检验第一个假设时,作者发现不同样本在涉及的五个子测试中的平均分数差异极小。然而,基于各种项目的极端分数比简单平均值更能有意义地反映表现这一假设,进行了更复杂的分析。该分析得出的结论是,这些情绪困扰青少年比公立学校的同龄人更冲动(即回答更快且犯错更多)。在检验第二个假设时,对不同测试之间以及测试内部的相互关系进行分析发现,40个相关性中有19个显著相关,其余21个中有14个在预测方向上相关。最后,将各亚组合并后的10个相关性中有9个在统计学上显著。