Decker T, Ruhnke M, Schneider W
Pathologisches Institut, Klinikum, Berlin-Buch.
Pathologe. 1997 Jan;18(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s002920050196.
The long-term disease free survival in patients treated by breast conserving therapy is similar to that of patients treated by mastectomy. In breast conserving therapy there is a significant risk of local recurrence. Although local recurrence does not appear to effect survival, there is certainly associated morbidity and attendant emotional trauma. Microscopic evaluation of the margins of lumpectomy specimens is the only way to define the extent of the tumour and the adequacy of resection. We intended to check the influence of standardized handling instructions for pathological examination on the results of histological margin assessment. These instructions are part of a practice protocol for all branches involved in BCT. We compared the results of our standardized margin investigation of 100 cases with the analysis of the margin status of 100 Lumpectomy specimens each from two other periods of time with different handling. Before 1989 only margins where tumor tissue was suspected when checked with the naked eye were investigated microscopically. From 1990 till 1991, margins were evaluated more intensively, but the evaluations were not standardized and did not consider the orientation of the ductal system, which was the base of examination after 1992. In 28% of cases, tumour tissue was found upon the investigation under the microscope, in the margins of lumpectomies where the margins looked clear to the naked eye. In the other periods tumour could be found in the margins in only 2% respectively 12%. Our results verify a strong influence of our practice protocol on the results of the examination of LE specimens: At first there is a higher sensitivity for tumor bearing margins compared with random sampling of margin tissue. Moreover, based on the consideration of the ductal orientation our protocol offers a better chance to detect in situ components of tumor in the margins. Finally with our method we are able to design exactly the tumor bearing margin and therefore we could take part in quality assurance of BCT.
保乳治疗患者的长期无病生存率与乳房切除术患者相似。在保乳治疗中,存在局部复发的重大风险。虽然局部复发似乎不影响生存率,但肯定会伴有发病率及随之而来的情感创伤。对肿块切除标本边缘进行显微镜评估是确定肿瘤范围和切除充分性的唯一方法。我们旨在检查病理检查标准化操作指南对组织学边缘评估结果的影响。这些指南是保乳治疗所有相关科室实践方案的一部分。我们将100例标准化边缘检查结果与另外两个不同处理时期各100例肿块切除标本的边缘状态分析进行了比较。1989年以前,仅对肉眼检查怀疑有肿瘤组织的边缘进行显微镜检查。1990年至1991年,对边缘的评估更加深入,但评估未标准化,也未考虑导管系统的方向,而导管系统方向是1992年后检查的基础。在28%的病例中,在肉眼看来边缘清晰的肿块切除标本边缘的显微镜检查中发现了肿瘤组织。在其他时期,边缘中分别仅2%和12%发现有肿瘤。我们的结果证实了我们的实践方案对肿块切除标本检查结果有很大影响:首先,与随机采集边缘组织相比,对有肿瘤的边缘有更高的敏感性。此外,基于对导管方向的考虑,我们的方案提供了更好的机会来检测边缘肿瘤的原位成分。最后,通过我们的方法,我们能够精确勾勒出有肿瘤的边缘,因此我们可以参与保乳治疗的质量保证。