Hütter B O, Würtemberger G
Neurochirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät, Technischen Hochschule, Aachen.
Pneumologie. 1997 Feb;51(2):108-14.
Quality of life has become an important criterion for assessing disease impact and treatment outcome. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) is an internationally widely used generic instrument for the measurement of health related quality of life. Furthermore, it has been frequently employed for research in patients suffering from airway diseases. Therefore, we developed a German version of the SIP and investigated its psychometric properties in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD).
After translation of the SIP into German, the results of a pilot study suggested several changes. Some items had to be reformulated and the SIP subscales "Emotional and affective behavior", "Alertness" and "Body care and movement" had to be discarded because of insufficient psychometric properties. The reliability, validity and sensitivity of the resulting German SIP version were investigated in a sample of 58 O2-dependent patients with COPD.
Internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha) was 0.93 for the entire instrument, while it was 0.85 for the SIP psycho-social scale and 0.89 for the SIP physical scale. The internal consistency ranged from 0.55 to 0.86 for the subscales of the German SIP version. The nutrition subscale was discarded because it showed an insufficient internal consistency (0.40). Indices of respiratory function (FEV1, FVC, Pa, O2, Sa, O2) and severity of dyspnea as assessed by the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI) were associated with the total SIP, psycho-social and physical score reaching from r = -0.19 to r = -0.48. Patients who improved after introduction of liquid oxygen therapy (LOX) showed a better total SIP score (p = 0.023) and less impairment in the SIP physical scale (p = 0.009). In order to evaluate the prognostic validity of the German SIP, a discriminance analysis between those patients who were alive 14 months later and those who had died of their illness was performed. A single discriminant function with an Eigenvalue of 0.59 (canonical correlation r = 0.61; CU2 = 21.213; df = 3; p < 0.001) was found. By means of the FVC, the severity of dyspnea (BDI), the SIP total score and the FEV1 85% of the survivors and 91 % of the fatalities could be predicted correctly.
The present results demonstrate sufficient psychometric properties of the German SIP version for the use in patients with COPD and hypoxemia. However, the internal consistencies of the subscales "Work" and "Leisure pastimes and recreation" remain to be improved. Furthermore, the results of factor and cluster analyses suggest some changes in the internal structure of the German SIP.
生活质量已成为评估疾病影响和治疗效果的重要标准。疾病影响量表(SIP)是一种国际上广泛使用的通用工具,用于测量与健康相关的生活质量。此外,它还经常用于气道疾病患者的研究。因此,我们开发了德语版的SIP,并在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中研究了其心理测量特性。
将SIP翻译成德语后,一项试点研究的结果提示了一些修改。一些项目需要重新制定,并且由于心理测量特性不足,SIP子量表“情绪和情感行为”、“警觉性”以及“身体护理和活动”不得不被舍弃。在58名依赖氧气的COPD患者样本中,对最终的德语版SIP的信度、效度和敏感性进行了研究。
整个量表的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数)为0.93,而SIP心理社会量表为0.85,SIP身体量表为0.89。德语版SIP子量表的内部一致性范围为0.55至0.86。营养子量表因内部一致性不足(0.40)而被舍弃。呼吸功能指标(第一秒用力呼气容积、用力肺活量、动脉血氧分压、动脉血氧饱和度)以及由基线呼吸困难指数(BDI)评估的呼吸困难严重程度与SIP总分、心理社会和身体得分相关,相关系数范围为r = -0.19至r = -0.48。引入液态氧疗法(LOX)后病情改善的患者,其SIP总分更好(p = 0.023),且SIP身体量表的损伤更小(p = 0.009)。为了评估德语版SIP的预后效度,对14个月后存活的患者和因病死亡的患者进行了判别分析。发现了一个特征值为0.59的单一判别函数(典型相关系数r = 0.61;卡方值CU2 = 21.213;自由度df = 3;p < 0.001)。通过用力肺活量、呼吸困难严重程度(BDI)、SIP总分以及第一秒用力呼气容积,能够正确预测85%的存活者和91%的死亡者。
目前的结果表明,德语版SIP在COPD和低氧血症患者中具有足够的心理测量特性。然而,“工作”和“休闲娱乐”子量表的内部一致性仍有待提高。此外,因子分析和聚类分析的结果表明德语版SIP的内部结构需要一些改变。