Prandoni P, Piccioli A
Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University of Padua, Via Ospedale Civile, 105, 35128-PADOVA, Italy.
Front Biosci. 1997 Apr 1;2:e12-20. doi: 10.2741/a221.
In recent years, a growing body of evidence has provided the convincing demonstration of a strong association between cancer and venous thromboembolism. This relationship is further supported by the risk of developing overt malignancy in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. However, the cost-to-benefit ratio of an extensive diagnostic work-up aimed at identifying an occult cancer in patients with spontaneous thromboembolism still has to be demonstrated. During prolonged immobilization from any cause, and following surgical interventions, patients with cancer are at a remarkably higher risk of venous thromboembolism than patients free from malignant disorders. Standard heparin in adjusted doses or a low-molecular-weight heparin in doses commonly recommended for high risk surgical patients represent the prophylactic treatment of choice for cancer patients undergoing an extensive abdominal or pelvic intervention. Furthermore, the risk of thrombotic episodes is increased in cancer patients by chemotherapy and by the use of indwelling central venous catheters. Recent data suggest a positive benefit-to-risk ratio with the systematical use of fixed mini-dose of warfarin in both conditions. After experiencing an episode of thrombosis, cancer patients remain at risk of recurrence for as long as the cancer is active. Therefore, they should be protected by a long-term course of oral anticoagulation. The risk of recurrent thrombotic events despite adequate anticoagulation is higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer. The routine use of long-term subcutaneous heparin therapy rather than oral anticoagulants should be reserved for patients in whom warfarin has been ineffective. Can antithrombotic drugs improve survival in cancer patients? In cancer patients affected by deep-vein thrombosis, the treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins has been reported to lower mortality at a higher extent than the standard heparin therapy. Such an observation suggests that these agents might develop an antineoplastic activity.
近年来,越来越多的证据有力地证明了癌症与静脉血栓栓塞之间存在密切关联。特发性静脉血栓栓塞患者发生显性恶性肿瘤的风险进一步支持了这种关系。然而,针对自发性血栓栓塞患者进行广泛诊断检查以识别隐匿性癌症的成本效益比仍有待证实。在因任何原因长期制动以及手术后,癌症患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险明显高于无恶性疾病的患者。调整剂量的标准肝素或通常推荐给高危手术患者的低分子量肝素剂量代表了接受广泛腹部或盆腔手术的癌症患者的预防性治疗选择。此外,化疗和使用留置中心静脉导管会增加癌症患者发生血栓事件的风险。最近的数据表明,在这两种情况下系统使用固定小剂量华法林具有正的风险效益比。经历一次血栓形成事件后,只要癌症处于活动期,癌症患者仍有复发风险。因此,他们应接受长期口服抗凝治疗。与无癌症患者相比,癌症患者在接受充分抗凝治疗后仍发生复发性血栓事件的风险更高。对于华法林治疗无效的患者,应保留常规使用长期皮下肝素治疗而非口服抗凝剂的方法。抗血栓药物能否提高癌症患者的生存率?据报道,在患有深静脉血栓形成的癌症患者中,低分子量肝素治疗比标准肝素治疗在更大程度上降低了死亡率。这一观察结果表明,这些药物可能具有抗肿瘤活性。