• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

γ-氨基丁酸(B)受体阻断可减轻麻醉兔中阻力负荷诱导的通气不足。

GABA(B) receptor blockade reduces resistive loading-induced hypoventilation in anesthetized rabbits.

作者信息

Delpierre S, Jammes Y

机构信息

Laboratoire de Physiologie Respiratoire, Faculté de Médecine Timone, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 1997 Apr 25;226(2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00240-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00240-1
PMID:9159495
Abstract

We hypothesized that hypoventilation induced by resistive loaded breathing may result in part from the inhibition of central respiratory-related structures by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), through the stimulation of GABA(B) receptors. In that case, ventilatory depression should be minimized by GABA(B) receptor blockade. To test this assumption, the ventilatory effects of a GABA(B) receptor antagonist (CGP 35348) were evaluated in two groups of urethane anesthetized rabbits, breathing either through an inspiratory resistive load (IRL group) or not (Control group). CGP 35348 did not modify baseline ventilation in the Control group. On the other hand, it partially reversed IRL-induced hypoventilation through a higher respiratory rate and central inspiratory drive. These data suggest that, unlike GABA(A) receptors, GABA(B) receptors would not play a part in eupneic breathing, but that they could participate in the hypoventilation resulting from an acute increase in the work of breathing.

摘要

我们推测,由阻力负荷呼吸诱导的通气不足可能部分是由于γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)通过刺激GABA(B)受体对中枢呼吸相关结构的抑制作用所致。在这种情况下,通气抑制应通过GABA(B)受体阻断作用而减至最小。为验证这一假设,在两组经氨基甲酸乙酯麻醉的家兔中评估了GABA(B)受体拮抗剂(CGP 35348)的通气效应,一组通过吸气阻力负荷呼吸(IRL组),另一组则无此负荷(对照组)。CGP 35348对对照组的基础通气无影响。另一方面,它通过提高呼吸频率和中枢吸气驱动,部分逆转了IRL诱导的通气不足。这些数据表明,与GABA(A)受体不同,GABA(B)受体在平静呼吸中不起作用,但它们可能参与了因呼吸功急性增加而导致的通气不足。

相似文献

1
GABA(B) receptor blockade reduces resistive loading-induced hypoventilation in anesthetized rabbits.γ-氨基丁酸(B)受体阻断可减轻麻醉兔中阻力负荷诱导的通气不足。
Neurosci Lett. 1997 Apr 25;226(2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00240-1.
2
Cardiorespiratory response to bicuculline during resistive loaded breathing in anesthetized rabbits.
Neurosci Lett. 1996 Jul 26;213(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12820-2.
3
Respiratory effects of baclofen and 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid in guinea-pigs.巴氯芬和3-氨丙基次膦酸对豚鼠的呼吸影响。
Br J Pharmacol. 1995 Feb;114(4):735-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb13265.x.
4
Effects of GABA receptor blockage on the respiratory response to hypoxia in sedated newborn piglets.γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)受体阻断对镇静新生仔猪低氧呼吸反应的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Aug;77(2):1006-10. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.1006.
5
Effects of serotonin receptor blockade by methysergide on loaded breathing in the rabbit.美西麦角阻断5-羟色胺受体对家兔负荷呼吸的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 1994 Oct 10;180(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90899-0.
6
Resistive loading reduces ventilatory response to strychnine in anesthetized rabbits.电阻性负荷降低麻醉兔对士的宁的通气反应。
Neurosci Lett. 1998 Oct 9;255(1):29-32. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00705-8.
7
Respiratory responses induced by blockades of GABA and glycine receptors within the Bötzinger complex and the pre-Bötzinger complex of the rabbit.兔延髓脑桥呼吸中枢内 GABA 和甘氨酸受体阻断引起的呼吸反应。
Brain Res. 2010 Jul 16;1344:134-47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.032. Epub 2010 May 17.
8
Neuropharmacological aspects of central respiratory regulation. An experimental study in the rat.中枢呼吸调节的神经药理学方面。大鼠实验研究。
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;524:1-109.
9
Effects of inspiratory resistive load on respiratory control in hypercapnia and exercise.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 May;66(5):2391-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.5.2391.
10
Analysis of ventilatory depression by enflurane during clinical anesthesia.恩氟烷在临床麻醉期间对通气抑制的分析。
Anesth Analg. 1980 Feb;59(2):103-9.