Chandler D P, Fredrickson J K, Brockman F J
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Environmental Microbiology Group, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
Mol Ecol. 1997 May;6(5):475-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00205.x.
Total DNA from sediment samples was isolated by a direct lysis technique. Purified DNA was used as template either undiluted or diluted 1:10 prior to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 16S rRNA genes. Full-length inserts were analysed for restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) with the enzyme Cfo1, and the resulting distribution and abundance of RFLP patterns compared between the undiluted and diluted PCR reactions. Results indicate that for low PCR template concentrations, in the range from a few picograms to tens of picograms DNA, proportional representation of specific RFLP types was not reproducible upon template dilution, confirming that PCR amplification of 16S rDNA cannot be used directly to infer microbial abundance. In particular, only 15-24% of the RFLP types recovered from a sample were present in both the undiluted and diluted extracts. We propose that very low template concentrations in the PCR generate random fluctuations in priming efficiency, which led to the contrast in RFLP types observed in the libraries from the undiluted and diluted extracts.
通过直接裂解技术从沉积物样本中分离出总DNA。纯化后的DNA在进行16S rRNA基因的聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增之前,要么未经稀释,要么按1:10稀释后用作模板。用Cfo1酶分析全长插入片段的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP),并比较未稀释和稀释后的PCR反应中所得RFLP模式的分布和丰度。结果表明,对于低PCR模板浓度,即几皮克到几十皮克DNA的范围,模板稀释后特定RFLP类型的比例代表性无法重现,这证实了16S rDNA的PCR扩增不能直接用于推断微生物丰度。特别是,从一个样本中回收的RFLP类型中,只有15 - 24%同时存在于未稀释和稀释后的提取物中。我们认为,PCR中极低的模板浓度会导致引物效率产生随机波动,这导致了从未稀释和稀释后的提取物文库中观察到的RFLP类型的差异。