Fisher B, Anderson S, Wickerham D L, DeCillis A, Dimitrov N, Mamounas E, Wolmark N, Pugh R, Atkins J N, Meyers F J, Abramson N, Wolter J, Bornstein R S, Levy L, Romond E H, Caggiano V, Grimaldi M, Jochimsen P, Deckers P
J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):1858-69. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.5.1858.
The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated a randomized trial (B-22) to determine if intensifying but maintaining the total dose of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ) in a doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, MI)-cyclophosphamide combination (AC), or if intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes.
Patients (N = 2,305) were randomized to receive either four courses of standard AC therapy (group 1); intensified therapy, in which the same total dose of cyclophosphamide was administered in two courses (group 2); or intensified and increased therapy, in which the total dose of cyclophosphamide was doubled (group 3). The dose and intensity of doxorubicin were similar in all groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were determined using life-table estimates.
There was no significant difference in DFS (P = .30) or overall survival (P = .95) among the groups through 5 years. At 5 years, the DFS of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (62% v 60%, respectively; P = .43) and to that of women in group 3 (62% v 64%, respectively; P = .59). The 5-year survival of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .86) and to that of women in group 3 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .82). Grade 4 toxicity increased in groups 2 and 3. Failure to note a difference in outcome among the groups was unrelated to either differences in amount and intensity of cyclophosphamide or to dose delays and intervals between courses of therapy.
Intensifying or intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide failed to significantly improve either DFS or overall survival in any group. It was concluded that, outside of a clinical trial, dose-intensification of cyclophosphamide in an AC combination represents inappropriate therapy for women with primary breast cancer.
美国国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)开展了一项随机试验(B - 22),以确定在阿霉素(阿霉素,法玛西亚公司,卡拉马祖,密歇根州)-环磷酰胺联合方案(AC)中强化但维持环磷酰胺(环磷酰胺,百时美施贵宝肿瘤公司,普林斯顿,新泽西州)的总剂量,或者强化并增加环磷酰胺的总剂量是否能改善原发性乳腺癌且腋窝淋巴结阳性女性的治疗效果。
患者(N = 2305)被随机分为三组,分别接受四个疗程的标准AC治疗(第1组);强化治疗,即在两个疗程中给予相同总剂量的环磷酰胺(第2组);或强化并增加治疗,即将环磷酰胺的总剂量加倍(第3组)。所有组中阿霉素的剂量和强度相似。采用寿命表估计法确定无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期。
在5年的观察期内,各组之间的DFS(P = 0.30)或总生存期(P = 0.95)无显著差异。5年时,第1组女性的DFS与第2组女性相似(分别为62%对60%;P = 0.43),与第3组女性也相似(分别为62%对64%;P = 0.59)。第1组女性的5年生存率与第2组女性相似(分别为78%对77%;P = 0.86),与第3组女性也相似(分别为78%对77%;P = 0.82)。第2组和第3组4级毒性反应增加。各组之间未观察到治疗效果差异,这与环磷酰胺的剂量和强度差异以及疗程之间的剂量延迟和间隔无关。
强化或强化并增加环磷酰胺的总剂量未能在任何组中显著改善DFS或总生存期。得出结论,在临床试验之外,AC联合方案中环磷酰胺的剂量强化对于原发性乳腺癌女性而言是不恰当的治疗方法。