• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Aphasia testing: a second look at the Porch Index of Communicative Ability.

作者信息

Martin A D

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1977 Nov;42(4):547-62. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4204.547.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.4204.547
PMID:916648
Abstract

It has been claimed that the Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA), through its multidimensional scoring system, corrects for lacks in other tests for aphasia. Specifically, the PICA is said to specify the details of the response and indicate the nature of the response; detect and describe small changes in the patient's responses; indicate the patient's level of communicative ability; and eliminate the subjectivity and bias present in descriptive methods of scoring. It is argued here that the PICA does none of these things and that the multidimensional scoring system as applied in the PICA is invalid.

摘要

相似文献

1
Aphasia testing: a second look at the Porch Index of Communicative Ability.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1977 Nov;42(4):547-62. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4204.547.
2
Practicality of shortening the Porch Index of Communicative Ability.
J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Sep;18(3):491-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1803.491.
3
Letter: The Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA): a psychometric problem and its solution.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 May;39(2):225-6. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3902.225.
4
Letter: The Porch Index of Communicative Ability (PICA): a psychometric problem and its solution. Comments.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1974 May;39(2):226-7. doi: 10.1044/jshd.3902.226.
5
Language impairment evaluation in aphasic patients: developing more efficient measures.失语症患者的语言障碍评估:开发更有效的测量方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978 Jul;59(7):327-30.
6
Comments on "comparison of alternatives to multidimensional scoring in the assessment of language comprehension in aphasia" by odekar and hallowell (2005).对奥德卡尔和哈洛威尔(2005年)所著《失语症语言理解评估中多维评分替代方法的比较》的评论
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):84-6; author reply 87-8. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/011).
7
Prediction of PICA overall score by short versions of the test.通过该测试的简短版本预测PICA总分。
J Speech Hear Res. 1980 Sep;23(3):511-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2303.511.
8
Multidimensional scoring in aphasia testing.失语症测试中的多维评分
J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Dec;14(4):776-92. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1404.776.
9
Aphasia associated with verified subcortical lesions: three case reports.与经证实的皮质下病变相关的失语症:三例病例报告。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Jun;67(6):410-4.
10
Prediction of language recovery in aphasic stroke patients using the Porch Index of Communicative Ability.
Br J Disord Commun. 1986 Apr;21(1):83-8. doi: 10.3109/13682828609018545.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of cognitive behavior language therapy for aphasia following stroke: Implications for language education research.认知行为语言疗法对中风后失语症的疗效:对语言教育研究的启示。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015305.