• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症。

Treatment of severe depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

作者信息

Schatzberg A F

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Stanford Medical Center, CA 94305-5548, USA.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 1996;4(4):182-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:4<182::AID-DA4>3.0.CO;2-H.

DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:4<182::AID-DA4>3.0.CO;2-H
PMID:9166650
Abstract

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are recognized as effective as and better tolerated than older antidepressant therapies and have become the drugs of choice in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. However, there is a clinical impression that the SSRIs are less effective than older therapies in the severely depressed patient. A limited number of trials have attempted to address this issue. This review assesses 16 controlled studies of SSRIs in severe depression. The findings from a majority of studies found the SSRIs to be superior to placebo and as effective as but better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in severely depressed patients. Although future studies are needed to corroborate and elaborate on these data, studies still support the use of SSRIs in this patient population.

摘要

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)被认为与较老的抗抑郁疗法疗效相当且耐受性更好,已成为治疗轻至中度抑郁症的首选药物。然而,临床上有一种印象,即SSRI在重度抑郁症患者中的疗效不如较老的疗法。少数试验试图解决这一问题。本综述评估了16项关于SSRI治疗重度抑郁症的对照研究。大多数研究结果发现,在重度抑郁症患者中,SSRI优于安慰剂,且与三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)疗效相当但耐受性更好。尽管需要进一步研究来证实和详细阐述这些数据,但现有研究仍支持在这一患者群体中使用SSRI。

相似文献

1
Treatment of severe depression with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症。
Depress Anxiety. 1996;4(4):182-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1996)4:4<182::AID-DA4>3.0.CO;2-H.
2
Pharmacotherapy for major depression with melancholic features: relative efficacy of tricyclic versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants.伴有抑郁特征的重度抑郁症的药物治疗:三环类与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药的相对疗效
J Affect Disord. 1996 Jun 20;39(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00014-6.
3
SSRIS versus tricyclic antidepressants in depressed inpatients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)与三环类抗抑郁药治疗住院抑郁症患者的疗效和耐受性的荟萃分析
Depress Anxiety. 1998;7 Suppl 1:11-7.
4
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药的疗效及耐受性荟萃分析
J Affect Disord. 2000 Apr;58(1):19-36. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0.
5
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants in young patients: a meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.年轻患者中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药的比较:疗效和可接受性的荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2014 Jul 1;36(7):1087-1095.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
6
The treatment of severe depression: is there an efficacy gap between SSRI and TCA antidepressant generations?重度抑郁症的治疗:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)类和三环类抗抑郁药几代产品之间存在疗效差距吗?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;55 Suppl A:55-9; discussion 60-1, 98-100.
7
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of discontinuation rates.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:停药率的荟萃分析
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Spring;9(1):47-53. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199400910-00008.
8
Efficacy of SSRIs and newer antidepressants in severe depression: comparison with TCAs.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)及新型抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:与三环类抗抑郁药的比较
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 May;60(5):326-35. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n0511.
9
Developments in the drug treatment of panic disorder: what is the place of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?惊恐障碍药物治疗的进展:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的地位如何?
J Affect Disord. 1996 Sep 9;40(1-2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00043-2.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide in comparison with placebo, tricyclic antidepressants, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in elderly depressed patients: a clinical overview.老年抑郁症患者中吗氯贝胺与安慰剂、三环类抗抑郁药及选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂相比的疗效及耐受性:一项临床综述
Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;42(10):1043-50. doi: 10.1177/070674379704201005.

引用本文的文献

1
Obsessive Compulsive and Related Disorders: From the Biological Basis to a Rational Pharmacological Treatment.强迫及相关障碍:从生物学基础到合理的药物治疗
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Jan 1;21(1):59-62. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx101.
2
Comparison of the effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in severely depressed patients.米氮平与氟西汀对重度抑郁症患者疗效的比较。
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(2):137-46. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519020-00004.