Christen Y, Wütschert R, Weimer D, de Moerloose P, Kruithof E K, Bounameaux H
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1997 Apr;8(3):185-90. doi: 10.1097/00001721-199704000-00005.
Pneumatic intermittent compression is an effective method to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism. Its efficacy has been ascribed to both a haemodynamic action (increase of blood flow velocity) and a stimulation of endogenous fibrinolytic activity [via the production of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) by the vascular endothelium]. The relative contribution of these two effects is still debated. In a randomized, cross-over study in ten healthy volunteers, we compared the haemodynamic and fibrinolytic effects of two different pneumatic intermittent compression devices: a classical, low-pressure, whole-leg boots system, and a novel, high-pressure, plantar compression system. The study was performed at rest, to compare haemodynamics and fibrinolytic activity modifications, and under induced venous leg stasis, in order to compare the two compression systems in experimental conditions mimicking laparoscopic surgery. Our data show that (1) a pneumatic compression device that exerts its compression on the plantar venous plexus only induced an increase of venous blood peak velocity and flow in the common femoral vein that is very similar to that induced by the classical whole-leg boots compression system; (2) the venous stasis induced by an external pressure mimicking the conditions of laparoscopic surgery further increased the absolute velocity and flow increase, with the two intermittent compression systems tested; (3) no changes of t-PA or plasminogen activator-inhibitor 1 antigens were observed with either pneumatic compression device. In conclusion, the present study indicates that the antithrombotic effect of mechanical prophylaxis is probably mainly due to its ability to increase venous peak velocity and flow, especially under venous stasis conditions.
气动间歇加压是预防术后静脉血栓栓塞的有效方法。其功效归因于血液动力学作用(血流速度增加)和对内源性纤维蛋白溶解活性的刺激[通过血管内皮产生组织型纤溶酶原激活物(t-PA)]。这两种作用的相对贡献仍存在争议。在一项针对10名健康志愿者的随机交叉研究中,我们比较了两种不同气动间歇加压装置的血液动力学和纤维蛋白溶解作用:一种传统的低压全腿靴系统和一种新型的高压足底加压系统。该研究在静息状态下进行,以比较血液动力学和纤维蛋白溶解活性的变化,并在诱导性下肢静脉淤滞情况下进行,以便在模拟腹腔镜手术的实验条件下比较两种加压系统。我们的数据表明:(1)仅对足底静脉丛施加压力的气动加压装置引起股总静脉静脉血峰值速度和流量的增加,这与传统全腿靴加压系统引起的增加非常相似;(2)在模拟腹腔镜手术条件的外部压力诱导的静脉淤滞情况下,两种测试的间歇加压系统进一步增加了绝对速度和流量的增加;(3)两种气动加压装置均未观察到t-PA或纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1抗原的变化。总之,本研究表明机械预防的抗血栓作用可能主要归因于其增加静脉峰值速度和流量的能力,尤其是在静脉淤滞情况下。