• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与毒物中心实习的急诊医学住院医师和药学专业学生的学习评估。

Assessment of learning by emergency medicine residents and pharmacy students participating in a poison center clerkship.

作者信息

Cobaugh D J, Goetz C M, Lopez G P, Dean B S, Krenzelok E P

机构信息

Finger Lakes Regional Poison Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Vet Hum Toxicol. 1997 Jun;39(3):173-5.

PMID:9167250
Abstract

An AAPCC-designated poison center developed and validated an objective testing instrument to evaluate learning during a poison center clinical rotation for 2nd-year emergency medicine residents and 5th-year pharmacy students. The examination contained multiple-choice, true-false, and fill-in questions pertaining to basic clinical toxicology. A pretest was administered prior to the rotation and a post-test was administered upon completion of the rotation. Overall pre-test mean was 56.2%; physician pre-test mean was 73.8%, and student pre-test mean was 43.9%. Overall post-test mean was 78.7%; physician post-test mean was 85.7%, and student post-test mean was 81%. Pre-test scores ranged from 21 to 86% for the group, and post-test scores ranged from 68 to 96%. The mean difference in pre-test to post-test score was 26.9%. These data suggest that a poison center rotation can result in significant increases in post-test scores in comparison to pre-test scores.

摘要

一个由美国毒物控制中心协会(AAPCC)指定的毒物控制中心开发并验证了一种客观测试工具,用于评估二年级急诊医学住院医师和五年级药学专业学生在毒物控制中心临床轮转期间的学习情况。该考试包含与基础临床毒理学相关的多项选择题、正误判断题和填空题。在轮转之前进行了预测试,在轮转结束时进行了后测试。总体预测试平均分是56.2%;医生预测试平均分是73.8%,学生预测试平均分是43.9%。总体后测试平均分是78.7%;医生后测试平均分是85.7%,学生后测试平均分是81%。该组预测试分数范围为21%至86%,后测试分数范围为68%至96%。预测试分数与后测试分数的平均差异为26.9%。这些数据表明,与预测试分数相比,毒物控制中心轮转可使后测试分数显著提高。

相似文献

1
Assessment of learning by emergency medicine residents and pharmacy students participating in a poison center clerkship.参与毒物中心实习的急诊医学住院医师和药学专业学生的学习评估。
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1997 Jun;39(3):173-5.
2
Poison center rotation for health science students.健康科学专业学生的毒物中心轮转
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1987 Apr;29(2):174-5.
3
Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial.基于模拟的急诊医学课程提高医学生满意度和考试成绩:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):684-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.025. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
4
Poison information providers: an assessment of proficiency.
Am J Emerg Med. 1984 Mar;2(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(84)80004-2.
5
Development of validated instrument to measure medical student learning in clinical urology: a step toward evidence based education.开发用于衡量医学生临床泌尿外科学习情况的有效工具:迈向循证医学教育的一步。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):282-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000128564.16232.23.
6
Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: validity evidence for a Script Concordance Test.评估儿科急诊医学中的临床推理:一份脚本一致性测试的效度证据
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 May;53(5):647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
7
A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students.基于模拟教学与传统医学教学的随机对照试验:临床医学专业学生的一项试点研究
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006 Feb;11(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s10459-004-7346-7.
8
Computerized student testing as a learning tool in a family practice clerkship.计算机化学生测试作为家庭医学实习中的一种学习工具。
Fam Med. 1994 Jan;26(1):14-7.
9
Evaluating the impact of emergency medicine education on medical interns' knowledge scores.评估急诊医学教育对实习医生知识得分的影响。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(5):257-60. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328344fe05.
10
Open book tests: assessment of academic learning in clerkships.开卷考试:临床实习中学术学习的评估
Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):456-62. doi: 10.1080/01421590500097075.

引用本文的文献

1
A Fellow's perspective on the threatened closure of the Illinois Poison Center.一位研究员对伊利诺伊州中毒控制中心面临关闭威胁的看法。
J Med Toxicol. 2014 Sep;10(3):251-3. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0407-2.
2
Multi-site heart disease risk assessment service provided by pharmacy students.由药学专业学生提供的多站点心脏病风险评估服务。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Apr 12;74(3):41. doi: 10.5688/aj740341.